Literature DB >> 10893470

Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance.

C M Mills1, K J McCulloch.   

Abstract

This investigation is a continuation of a previously published study assessing the treatment effects of the Twin Block appliance. All active treatment was carried out during the mixed dentition stage (mean starting age, 9 years 1 month) with final follow-up for the treatment group occurring in the permanent dentition (mean age, 13 years 1 month). Of the original group consisting of 28 consecutively treated severe skeletal Class II patients, 26 were available for follow-up. A comparison group of 28 untreated Class II subjects matched for age, sex, and vertical facial type was obtained from the Burlington Growth Centre according to the original study design. Of these 28 control subjects, 24 had 4-year follow-up cephalometric films available. The mean age of the controls was 12 years 11 months at the time of follow-up. During the active treatment phase, the Twin Block group experienced an average increase in mandibular unit length of 6.5 mm over a mean of 14 months (annualized rate of change of 5.6 mm per year). In comparison, the control group experienced a 2.3 mm increase in mandibular unit length during the 13-month observation period (annualized rate of 2.1 mm per year). In the posttreatment phase, the change in mandibular unit length for the Twin Block group was 6.0 mm over a 36-month period (annualized rate of change of 2.0 mm per year). The control group experienced an average increase in mandibular unit length of 6.7 mm over the posttreatment assessment period that was 34 months in duration (annualized rate of change of 2.4 mm per year). Although there was a slight reduction in mandibular growth rate after treatment, much of the significant increase in mandibular length achieved during the active phase of treatment with the Twin Block appliance was still present 3 years later when the subjects had matured into the permanent dentition stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10893470     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.104902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  15 in total

1.  Non-surgical treatment of an Angle Class III malocclusion in adults.

Authors:  Hong Liu; Jian-Xue Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2013-09-25

2.  Effects of wear time differences of removable functional appliances in class II patients: prospective MRI study of TMJ and masticatory muscle changes.

Authors:  Emre Cesur; Orhan Özdiler; Ayşegül Köklü; Kaan Orhan; Umut Seki
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Analysis of clinical efficacy of interceptive treatment of Class II division 2 malocclusion in a pair of twins through the use of two modified removable appliances.

Authors:  R Condò; C Perugia; M Bartolino; R Docimo
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2011-01-13

4.  Three-dimensional skeletal, dentoalveolar and temporomandibular joint changes produced by Twin Block functional appliance.

Authors:  Hanem Younes Elfeky; Mona Salah Fayed; Maged Sultan Alhammadi; Sanaa Abou Zeid Soliman; Dalia Mohamed El Boghdadi
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Second Class Functional Treatment: Andreasen Activator vs Twin Block.

Authors:  Giulia Baccaglione; Elisa Rota; Maurizio Ferrari; Marcello Maddalone
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr

6.  Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the correction of class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Ashok Kumar Jena; Ritu Duggal
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  A comparison of the treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistance Device and the Twin Block appliance in patients with class II malocclusions.

Authors:  Abdulfatah Hanoun; Thikriat S Al-Jewair; Sawsan Tabbaa; Mhd Amer Allaymouni; Charles B Preston
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2014-08-02

8.  Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the Bionator, Herbst, Twin Block, and MARA functional appliances.

Authors:  Nicole J Siara-Olds; Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; Jeff Berger; Burcu Bayirli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Mechanisms of Class II correction induced by the crown Herbst appliance as a single-phase Class II therapy: 1 year follow-up.

Authors:  Gundega Jakobsone; Dalia Latkauskiene; James A McNamara
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance.

Authors:  Rahul Trivedi; Amit Bhattacharya; Falguni Mehta; Dolly Patel; Harshik Parekh; Vaibhav Gandhi
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.