BACKGROUND: The prevalence of asthma has increased in developed countries in the past 2 decades. The effectiveness of intervention measures on the primary prevention of asthma has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention program in the primary prevention of asthma in high-risk infants (in this study, infants are defined as persons from birth to the age of 1 year). DESIGN: Prospective, prenatally randomized, controlled study with follow-up through the age of 1 year. SETTING:University hospital-based settings at 2 Canadian centers: Vancouver, British Columbia, and Winnipeg, Manitoba. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 545 high-risk infants (at least 1 first-degree relative with asthma or 2 first-degree relatives with other IgE-mediated allergic diseases) identified before birth. INTERVENTIONS: Avoidance of house dust mite and pet allergens and environmental tobacco smoke, encouragement of breastfeeding, and supplementation with a partially hydrolyzed formula. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Probable or possible asthma, rhinitis without apparent colds, and a prick skin test result positive for common inhalant allergens. RESULTS: Thirty-eight (15.1%) of the 251 infants available for assessment in the intervention group and 49 (20.2%) of the 242 infants available for assessment in the control group fulfilled the criteria for possible or probable asthma (adjusted relative risk, 0.66; 90% confidence interval, 0.44-0.98). Also, 16.7% of the infants in the intervention group and 27.3% of the infants in the control group developed rhinitis without colds (adjusted relative risk, 0.51; 90% confidence interval, 0.35-0.74). The incidence of positive skin test results to 1 or more inhalant allergens was similar in both groups (4.4% in the intervention group and 4.6% in the control group). CONCLUSIONS: Our multifaceted intervention program resulted in a modest but significant (P= .04) reduction in the risk of possible or probable asthma and rhinitis without apparent colds at the age of 12 months in high-risk infants. In the absence of a validated definition of asthma at the age of 12 months, follow-up studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of the intervention program in the primary prevention of asthma in high-risk infants.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of asthma has increased in developed countries in the past 2 decades. The effectiveness of intervention measures on the primary prevention of asthma has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention program in the primary prevention of asthma in high-risk infants (in this study, infants are defined as persons from birth to the age of 1 year). DESIGN: Prospective, prenatally randomized, controlled study with follow-up through the age of 1 year. SETTING: University hospital-based settings at 2 Canadian centers: Vancouver, British Columbia, and Winnipeg, Manitoba. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 545 high-risk infants (at least 1 first-degree relative with asthma or 2 first-degree relatives with other IgE-mediated allergic diseases) identified before birth. INTERVENTIONS: Avoidance of house dust mite and pet allergens and environmental tobacco smoke, encouragement of breastfeeding, and supplementation with a partially hydrolyzed formula. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Probable or possible asthma, rhinitis without apparent colds, and a prick skin test result positive for common inhalant allergens. RESULTS: Thirty-eight (15.1%) of the 251 infants available for assessment in the intervention group and 49 (20.2%) of the 242 infants available for assessment in the control group fulfilled the criteria for possible or probable asthma (adjusted relative risk, 0.66; 90% confidence interval, 0.44-0.98). Also, 16.7% of the infants in the intervention group and 27.3% of the infants in the control group developed rhinitis without colds (adjusted relative risk, 0.51; 90% confidence interval, 0.35-0.74). The incidence of positive skin test results to 1 or more inhalant allergens was similar in both groups (4.4% in the intervention group and 4.6% in the control group). CONCLUSIONS: Our multifaceted intervention program resulted in a modest but significant (P= .04) reduction in the risk of possible or probable asthma and rhinitis without apparent colds at the age of 12 months in high-risk infants. In the absence of a validated definition of asthma at the age of 12 months, follow-up studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of the intervention program in the primary prevention of asthma in high-risk infants.
Authors: Denise Daley; Mathieu Lemire; Loubna Akhabir; Moira Chan-Yeung; Jian Qing He; Treena McDonald; Andrew Sandford; Dorota Stefanowicz; Ben Tripp; David Zamar; Yohan Bosse; Vincent Ferretti; Alexandre Montpetit; Marie-Catherine Tessier; Allan Becker; Anita L Kozyrskyj; John Beilby; Pamela A McCaskie; Bill Musk; Nicole Warrington; Alan James; Catherine Laprise; Lyle J Palmer; Peter D Paré; Thomas J Hudson Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2009-02-27 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: G Feljandro P Ramos; Antoinette D I van Asselt; Sandra Kuiper; Johan L Severens; Tanja Maas; Edward Dompeling; J André Knottnerus; Onno C P van Schayck Journal: Eur J Health Econ Date: 2013-10-06
Authors: Thomas W Largo; Michele Borgialli; Courtney L Wisinski; Robert L Wahl; Wesley F Priem Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2011 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.792