AIMS: To assess the clinical usefulness of a commercial aspergillus antigen enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA) in bone marrow transplant recipients, and to compare it with a commercial latex agglutination (LA) test. METHODS: In total, 2026 serum samples from 104 bone marrow transplant recipients were tested. These comprised 67 sera from seven patients who had died with confirmed IA, 268 sera from nine patients who had died with suspected IA, and 1691 sera from 88 patients with no clinical, radiological, or microbiological signs of IA. RESULTS: The ELISA was more sensitive than the LA test. All patients who were ELISA positive were also LA positive, and a positive LA result never preceded a positive ELISA. Twelve of 16 patients with confirmed or suspected IA were ELISA positive on two or more occasions, compared with 10 of 15 who were LA positive. ELISA was positive before LA in five patients (range, 2-14 days), and became positive on the same day in the remainder. Aspergillus antigen was detected by ELISA a median of 15 days before death (range, 4-233). Clinical and/or radiological evidence of IA was noted in all patients, and a positive ELISA was never the sole criterion for introduction of antifungal treatment. Two samples (one from each of two patients without IA) gave false positive results. CONCLUSIONS: The aspergillus ELISA is a specific indicator of invasive aspergillosis if the criterion of two positive samples is required to confirm the diagnosis. However, the test is insufficiently sensitive to diagnose aspergillosis before other symptoms or signs are apparent, and hence is unlikely to lead to earlier initiation of antifungal treatment. It is therefore unsuitable for screening of asymptomatic patients at risk of invasive aspergillosis, but does have a useful role in confirming the diagnosis in symptomatic patients.
AIMS: To assess the clinical usefulness of a commercial aspergillus antigen enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA) in bone marrow transplant recipients, and to compare it with a commercial latex agglutination (LA) test. METHODS: In total, 2026 serum samples from 104 bone marrow transplant recipients were tested. These comprised 67 sera from seven patients who had died with confirmed IA, 268 sera from nine patients who had died with suspected IA, and 1691 sera from 88 patients with no clinical, radiological, or microbiological signs of IA. RESULTS: The ELISA was more sensitive than the LA test. All patients who were ELISA positive were also LA positive, and a positive LA result never preceded a positive ELISA. Twelve of 16 patients with confirmed or suspected IA were ELISA positive on two or more occasions, compared with 10 of 15 who were LA positive. ELISA was positive before LA in five patients (range, 2-14 days), and became positive on the same day in the remainder. Aspergillus antigen was detected by ELISA a median of 15 days before death (range, 4-233). Clinical and/or radiological evidence of IA was noted in all patients, and a positive ELISA was never the sole criterion for introduction of antifungal treatment. Two samples (one from each of two patients without IA) gave false positive results. CONCLUSIONS: The aspergillus ELISA is a specific indicator of invasive aspergillosis if the criterion of two positive samples is required to confirm the diagnosis. However, the test is insufficiently sensitive to diagnose aspergillosis before other symptoms or signs are apparent, and hence is unlikely to lead to earlier initiation of antifungal treatment. It is therefore unsuitable for screening of asymptomatic patients at risk of invasive aspergillosis, but does have a useful role in confirming the diagnosis in symptomatic patients.
Authors: R B Colvin; A H Cohen; C Saiontz; S Bonsib; M Buick; B Burke; S Carter; T Cavallo; M Haas; A Lindblad; J C Manivel; C C Nast; D Salomon; C Weaver; M Weiss Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 1997-12 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: D Caillot; O Casasnovas; A Bernard; J F Couaillier; C Durand; B Cuisenier; E Solary; F Piard; T Petrella; A Bonnin; G Couillault; M Dumas; H Guy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: P Rohrlich; J Sarfati; P Mariani; M Duval; A Carol; C Saint-Martin; E Bingen; J P Latge; E Vilmer Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 1996-03 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: E J Anaissie; D P Kontoyiannis; S O'Brien; H Kantarjian; L Robertson; S Lerner; M J Keating Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1998-10-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Mariska M G Leeflang; Yvette J Debets-Ossenkopp; Junfeng Wang; Caroline E Visser; Rob J P M Scholten; Lotty Hooft; Henk A Bijlmer; Johannes B Reitsma; Mingming Zhang; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Christina M Vandenbroucke-Grauls Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-12-30
Authors: P Lewis White; John R Wingard; Stéphane Bretagne; Jürgen Löffler; Thomas F Patterson; Monica A Slavin; Rosemary A Barnes; Peter G Pappas; J Peter Donnelly Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-06-25 Impact factor: 9.079