Literature DB >> 10888603

The most frequent constitutional translocation in humans, the t(11;22)(q23;q11) is due to a highly specific alu-mediated recombination.

A S Hill1, N J Foot, T L Chaplin, B D Young.   

Abstract

The t(11;22) is the most common recurrent non-Robertsonian constitutional translocation in humans, having been reported in more than 160 unrelated families. Balanced carriers are at risk of having offspring with the derivative 22 syndrome owing to 3:1 meiotic non-disjunction event. Clinical features of the der(22) syndrome include mental retardation, craniofacial abnormalities and congenital heart defects. The breakpoints for the t(11;22) translocation have been mapped to specific Alu repeats on chromosomes 11 and 22, indicating that this event is due to an Alu-Alu recombination. Remarkably, in five samples derived from individuals with no apparent common ancestry the der(11) and der(22) breakpoints appear to be almost identical at the genomic sequence level. The small number of base differences between the samples indicates some variation in the position of the breakpoints, although this appears to be quite limited. Indeed, the der(11) breakpoints are all located within a region of just 32 bp and the der(22) breakpoints within 21 bp. If, as suggested by current data, the widespread occurrence of this translocation is due to multiple independent events, our results suggest that this particular Alu-Alu recombination is subject to an unprecedented degree of selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10888603     DOI: 10.1093/hmg/9.10.1525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  8 in total

1.  AT-rich palindromes mediate the constitutional t(11;22) translocation.

Authors:  L Edelmann; E Spiteri; K Koren; V Pulijaal; M G Bialer; A Shanske; R Goldberg; B E Morrow
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-11-28       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Mechanisms leading to nonrandom, nonhomologous chromosomal translocations in leukemia.

Authors:  Susanne M Gollin
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 3.  Inviting instability: Transposable elements, double-strand breaks, and the maintenance of genome integrity.

Authors:  D J Hedges; P L Deininger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Bioinformatics and genomic analysis of transposable elements in eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Mateusz Janicki; Rebecca Rooke; Guojun Yang
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.620

Review 5.  The Interchromosomal Effect: Different Meanings for Different Organisms.

Authors:  Danny E Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Organization and evolution of a gene-rich region of the mouse genome: a 12.7-Mb region deleted in the Del(13)Svea36H mouse.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Mallon; Laurens Wilming; Joseph Weekes; James G R Gilbert; Jennifer Ashurst; Sandrine Peyrefitte; Lucy Matthews; Matthew Cadman; Richard McKeone; Chris A Sellick; Ruth Arkell; Marc R M Botcherby; Mark A Strivens; R Duncan Campbell; Simon Gregory; Paul Denny; John M Hancock; Jane Rogers; Steve D M Brown
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Large duplications at reciprocal translocation breakpoints that might be the counterpart of large deletions and could arise from stalled replication bubbles.

Authors:  Karen D Howarth; Jessica C M Pole; Juliet C Beavis; Elizabeth M Batty; Scott Newman; Graham R Bignell; Paul A W Edwards
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Mortality and cancer incidence in carriers of constitutional t(11;22)(q23;q11) translocations: A prospective study.

Authors:  Minouk J Schoemaker; Michael E Jones; Craig D Higgins; Alan F Wright; Anthony J Swerdlow
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 7.396

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.