Literature DB >> 10885211

Quantitative vs qualitative research methods.

M Lakshman1, L Sinha, M Biswas, M Charles, N K Arora.   

Abstract

Quantitative methods have been widely used because of the fact that things that can be measured or counted gain scientific credibility over the unmeasurable. But the extent of biological abnormality, severity, consequences and the impact of illness cannot be satisfactorily captured and answered by the quantitative research alone. In such situations qualitative methods take a holistic perspective preserving the complexities of human behavior by addressing the "why" and "how" questions. In this paper an attempt has been made to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of both the methods and also that a balanced mix of both qualitative as well as quantitative methods yield the most valid and reliable results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10885211     DOI: 10.1007/BF02820690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Pediatr        ISSN: 0019-5456            Impact factor:   5.319


  10 in total

1.  The role of diagnostic inconsistency in changing rates of occurrence for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  B Burnand; A R Feinstein
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Conducting comparative focus-group research: cautionary comments from a coordinator.

Authors:  J Knodel
Journal:  Health Transit Rev       Date:  1994-04

3.  Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: an introduction.

Authors:  A Steckler; K R McLeroy; R M Goodman; S T Bird; L McCormick
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1992

4.  Evaluating the quality of qualitative research: a proposal pro tem.

Authors:  T S Inui; R M Frankel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research)

Authors:  T Greenhalgh; R Taylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-20

6.  Qualitative inquiry in medical research.

Authors:  H R Holman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Obstacles to medical audit: British doctors speak.

Authors:  N Black; E Thompson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Why we need qualitative research.

Authors:  N Black
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 9.  Imprecision of the clinical diagnosis of coronary heart disease in epidemiological studies and atherogenesis.

Authors:  W E Stehbens
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Idioms of distress: alternatives in the expression of psychosocial distress: a case study from South India.

Authors:  M Nichter
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  1981-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.