Literature DB >> 8480231

Obstacles to medical audit: British doctors speak.

N Black1, E Thompson.   

Abstract

Currently, British doctors are being encouraged by government, managers and their professional associations to undertake medical audit. How easy a task will it be to introduce audit? In an attempt to find out, doctors working in general, geriatric and accident and emergency medicine in four district general hospitals were interviewed. Twenty-eight consultants and 34 junior doctors participated. Generally speaking, doctors accepted the need for audit. In this paper we have focussed deliberately on their worries, since it is these which are of most importance in developing better methods of implementation. The 19 obstacles to audit that respondents identified can be grouped into four categories: perceptions of the need for and the role of audit; practical considerations; the effects of audit; and anxieties about the use of audit. In general, criticisms were levelled at the way audit was being implemented rather than at the principles of the approach. While some obstacles could be overcome by simple, practical measures, others will require a change in doctors' knowledge, beliefs and attitudes. The difficulty of achieving such changes should not be underestimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8480231     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90077-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  18 in total

Review 1.  Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit.

Authors:  G Johnston; I K Crombie; H T Davies; E M Alder; A Millard
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  Is audit running out of steam?

Authors:  R G Thomson; A G Barton
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-12

3.  Audit in the therapy professions: some constraints on progress.

Authors:  S Robinson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-12

4.  Low profile, high impact: the role of the sociologist in quality in health care.

Authors:  R Chesson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-12

5.  Clinical audit and the purchaser-provider interaction: different attitudes and expectations in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  R Thomson; C Elcoat; E Pugh
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-06

6.  Qualitative methods for assessing health care.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; M Boulton
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-06

7.  Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program.

Authors:  Mary Dixon-Woods; Charles L Bosk; Emma Louise Aveling; Christine A Goeschel; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Can GPs audit their ability to detect psychological distress? One approach and some unresolved issues.

Authors:  A Howe
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Implementation of quality assurance and medical audit: general practitioners' perceived obstacles and requirements.

Authors:  R Grol; M Wensing
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Clinical audit: more research is required.

Authors:  A Barton; R Thomson; R Bhopal
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.