Literature DB >> 10885084

The health of their nation: how would citizens develop England's health strategy?

N Bradley1, K Sweeney, M Waterfield.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: England's first health strategy, The Health of the Nation, was formulated without systematic input from the citizens whose health it targeted. Several studies indicate that citizens, when asked to prioritize services, rank interventions for acute and life-threatening conditions highest. But how they view and what they want in the areas of prevention, public health, or care for the chronically and mentally ill is not known. AIM: To explore citizens' attitudes towards England's health strategy as set out in The Health of the Nation and to elicit their ideas for developing it further.
METHOD: The study was conducted in four general practices and a secondary school in southwest England. The design was a qualitative analysis of testimony from 24 audiotaped focus groups. Twenty-three groups were drawn from lists of National Health Service registered patients, stratified by The Health of the Nation target category, and one group was drawn from 13 to 15 year-old girls at a mixed secondary school. In all, 173 citizens took part in the 24 focus group meetings.
RESULTS: In group discussions, these citizens demonstrated an understanding of The Health of the Nation strategy, which enabled them to form views and develop relevant arguments. They produced 26 specific ideas for developing the strategy across its five key areas. There was congruence with the action plans of a national expert group convened by the Department of Health and charged with reviewing the strategy's progress. The focus groups went beyond the experts' proposals, with further practical ideas to achieve The Health of the Nation targets.
CONCLUSION: Citizens in this study contributed a broad range of relevant, appropriate, and innovative ideas on how to develop health strategy. The use of focus groups to achieve this is practical and efficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10885084      PMCID: PMC1313531     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  7 in total

1.  The use of targets to improve the performance of health care providers: a discussion of government policy.

Authors:  R Elkan; J Robinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Involving users of health care services: moving beyond lip service.

Authors:  N Joule
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-12

3.  Public opinion and purchasing.

Authors:  A Richardson; M Charny; S Hanmer-Lloyd
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-03-14

4.  Setting priorities: is there a role for citizens' juries?

Authors:  J Lenaghan; B New; E Mitchell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-22

5.  Consulting the public about health service priorities.

Authors:  C Bowie; A Richardson; W Sykes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-10-28

6.  Why do qualitative research?

Authors:  R Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-01

7.  Health care rationing: the public's debate.

Authors:  A Bowling
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.