Literature DB >> 10884726

MRI of the claustrophobic patient: interventionally configured magnets.

E Spouse1, W M Gedroyc.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether or not claustrophobic patients would tolerate a scan in an open configuration interventional magnetic resonance (iMR) imaging unit, when they had failed to complete a diagnostic scan in a conventional MRI system. 50 claustrophobic subjects were entered into the study. Their response to the iMR environment was compared with their previous experience in an MRI scanner by means of a two-stage questionnaire. Part 1 was completed before their iMR scan and Part 2 following their attempt at imaging in the iMR unit. 60% (n = 30) of the participants were female and 40% (n = 20) were male, age range 25-71 years (mean 49.5 years). 48% (n = 24) were lumbar spine studies and 28% (n = 14) were studies of the head. 24% (n = 12) underwent scanning of other anatomical regions. 94% (n = 47) of participants underwent successful MRI in the interventional magnet without extra sedation. 6% (n = 3) failed to complete a diagnostic scan in the iMR machine. The GE Signa 0.5 T SP magnet allows successful MRI in 94% of the claustrophobic population who have failed to complete a scan in a conventional diagnostic machine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10884726     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.73.866.10884726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  5 in total

1.  Reviewing the process of preparing children for MRI.

Authors:  Leanne M Hallowell; Shari E Stewart; Cicero T de Amorim E Silva; Michael R Ditchfield
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-12-15

2.  Reduction of claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: methods and design of the "CLAUSTRO" randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Judith Enders; Elke Zimmermann; Matthias Rief; Peter Martus; Randolf Klingebiel; Patrick Asbach; Christian Klessen; Gerd Diederichs; Thomas Bengner; Ulf Teichgräber; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 1.930

3.  Reduction of claustrophobia with short-bore versus open magnetic resonance imaging: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Judith Enders; Elke Zimmermann; Matthias Rief; Peter Martus; Randolf Klingebiel; Patrick Asbach; Christian Klessen; Gerd Diederichs; Moritz Wagner; Ulf Teichgräber; Thomas Bengner; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  High-field open versus short-bore magnetic resonance imaging of the spine: a randomized controlled comparison of image quality.

Authors:  Judith Enders; Matthias Rief; Elke Zimmermann; Patrick Asbach; Gerd Diederichs; Christoph Wetz; Eberhard Siebert; Moritz Wagner; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Patient preferences for development in MRI scanner design: a survey of claustrophobic patients in a randomized study.

Authors:  Elisa Iwan; Jinhua Yang; Judith Enders; Adriane Elisabeth Napp; Matthias Rief; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.