Literature DB >> 10883613

Factors affecting outcome in free-tissue transfer in the elderly.

J M Serletti1, J P Higgins, S Moran, G S Orlando.   

Abstract

Free-tissue transfers have become the preferred surgical technique to treat complex reconstructive defects. Because these procedures typically require longer operative times and recovery periods, the applicability of free-flap reconstruction in the elderly continues to require ongoing review. The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 100 patients aged 65 years and older who underwent free-tissue transfers to determine preoperative and intraoperative predictors of surgical complications, medical complications, and reconstructive failures. The parameters studied included patient demographics, past medical history, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) status, site and cause of the defect, the free tissue transferred, operative time, and postoperative complications, including free-flap success or failure. The mean age of the patients was 72 years. A total of 46 patients underwent free-tissue transfer after head and neck ablation, 27 underwent lower extremity reconstruction in the setting of peripheral vascular disease, 10 had lower extremity traumatic wounds, nine had breast reconstructions, four had infected wounds, two had chronic wounds, and two underwent transfer for lower extremity tumor ablation. Two patients had an ASA status of 1, 49 patients had a status of 2, 45 patients had a status of 3, and four had a status of 4. A total of 104 flaps were transferred in these 100 patients. There were 49 radial forearm flaps, 34 rectus abdominis flaps, seven latissimus dorsi flaps, seven fibular osteocutaneous flaps, three omental flaps, three jejunal flaps, and one lateral arm flap. Four patients had planned double free flaps for their reconstruction. Mean operative time was 7.8 hours (range, 3.5 to 16.5 hours). The overall flap success rate was 97 percent, and the overall reconstructive success rate was 92 percent. There were six additional reconstructive failures related to flap loss, all of which occurred more than 1 month after surgery. Patients with a higher ASA designation experienced more medical complications (p = 0.03) but not surgical complications. Increased operative time resulted in more surgical complications (p = 0.019). All eight cases of reconstructive failure occurred in patients undergoing limb salvage surgery in the setting of peripheral vascular disease. Free-tissue transfer in the elderly population demonstrates similar success rates to those of the general population. Age alone should not be considered a contraindication or an independent risk factor for free-tissue transfer. ASA status and length of operative time are significant predictors of postoperative medical and surgical morbidity. The higher rate of reconstructive failure in the elderly peripheral vascular disease population compares favorably with other treatment modalities for this disease process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10883613     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200007000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  34 in total

1.  Treatment of head and neck cancer in the elderly: European Consensus (panel 6) at the EUFOS Congress in Vienna 2007.

Authors:  Reidar Grénman; Dominique Chevalier; Vincent Gregoire; Eugene Myers; Simon Rogers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Optimal management of the elderly patient with head and neck cancer: Issues regarding surgery, irradiation and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Giannis Mountzios
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-10

3.  The old and ill: influence and impact on the reconstructive effort.

Authors:  O Koray Coşkunfırat; Omer Ozkan
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Management of post-operative maxillofacial oncology patients without the routine use of an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Seema Alice Mathew; P Senthilnathan; Vinod Narayanan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-01-18

5.  Postoperative care and monitoring of the reconstructed head and neck patient.

Authors:  Christopher J Salgado; Harvey Chim; Shayla Schoenoff; Samir Mardini
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.314

6.  [Reconstruction of maxillary defects using a free scapular angle flap].

Authors:  O C Bulut; P A Federspil; P K Plinkert; C Simon
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Head and neck cancer in the elderly: a retrospective study over 10 years (1999 - 2008).

Authors:  Astrid L Kruse; Marius Bredell; Heinz T Luebbers; Klaus W Grätz
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2010-10-05

8.  Incidence and risk factors for morbidity and mortality in elderly head and neck cancer patients undergoing major oncological surgery.

Authors:  Shin Hyuk Yoo; Jong-Lyel Roh; Seung-Ho Choi; Soon Yuhl Nam; Sang Yoon Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  End-to-end versus end-to-side venous microanastomoses in head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  Cesare Piazza; Valentina Taglietti; Alberto Paderno; Piero Nicolai
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer can be safely performed in both young and elderly patients after careful patient selection.

Authors:  Thomas T A Peters; Sophie F Post; Boukje A C van Dijk; Jan L N Roodenburg; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Paul M N Werker; Gyorgy B Halmos
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.