Literature DB >> 10883387

The excitability of human cortical inhibitory circuits responsible for the muscle silent period after transcranial brain stimulation.

V Bertasi1, L Bertolasi, E Frasson, A Priori.   

Abstract

The silent period after transcranial magnetic brain stimulation mainly reflects the activity of inhibitory circuits in the human motor cortex. To assess the excitability of the cortical inhibitory mechanisms responsible for the silent period after transcranial stimulation, we studied, in 15 healthy human subjects, the recovery cycle of the silent period evoked by transcranial and mixed nerve stimulation delivered with a paired stimulation technique. The recovery cycle is defined as the time course of the changes in the size or duration of a conditioned test response when pairs of stimuli (conditioning and test) are used at different conditioning-test intervals. The recovery cycle of the duration of the silent period in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle during maximum voluntary contraction after transcranial magnetic stimulation was studied by delivering paired magnetic shocks (a conditioning shock and a test shock) at 120% motor-threshold intensity. Conditioning-test intervals ranged from 20-550 ms. The recovery cycle of the silent period in the FDI muscle during maximum voluntary contraction after nerve stimulation was evaluated by paired, supramaximum bipolar electrical stimulation of the ulnar nerve at the wrist (conditioning-test intervals ranging from 20 to 550 ms). Electromyographic activity was recorded by a pair of surface-disk electrodes over the FDI muscle. The recovery cycle of the silent period after transcranial magnetic stimulation delivered through the large round coil showed two phases of facilitation (lengthening of the silent period), one at 20-40 ms and the other at 180-350 ms conditioning-test intervals, with an interposed phase of inhibition (shortening of the silent period) at 80-160 ms. The conditioning magnetic shock left the size of the test motor-evoked potentials statistically unchanged during maximum voluntary contraction. Paired transcranial stimulation with a figure-of-eight coil increased the duration of the test silent period only at short conditioning-test intervals. Conditioning nerve stimulation left the silent period produced by test nerve stimulation unchanged. In conclusion, after a single transcranial magnetic shock, inhibitory circuits in the human motor cortex undergo distinctive short-term changes in their excitability, probably involving different mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10883387     DOI: 10.1007/s002210000352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  10 in total

1.  Excitability of the human trigeminal motoneuronal pool and interactions with other brainstem reflex pathways.

Authors:  G Cruccu; A Truini; A Priori
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Proposed cortical and sub-cortical contributions to the long-latency stretch reflex in the forearm.

Authors:  Gwyn N Lewis; Melody A Polych; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Short-term effects of functional electrical stimulation on motor-evoked potentials in ankle flexor and extensor muscles.

Authors:  Aiko Kido Thompson; Richard B Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Electrical stimulation of the human common peroneal nerve elicits lasting facilitation of cortical motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Michael E Knash; Aiko Kido; Monica Gorassini; K Ming Chan; Richard B Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Long-interval intracortical inhibition in a human hand muscle.

Authors:  Chris J McNeil; Peter G Martin; Simon C Gandevia; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Can Operant Conditioning of EMG-Evoked Responses Help to Target Corticospinal Plasticity for Improving Motor Function in People With Multiple Sclerosis?

Authors:  Aiko K Thompson; Thomas Sinkjær
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans.

Authors:  G Batsikadze; V Moliadze; W Paulus; M-F Kuo; M A Nitsche
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Attention influences the excitability of cortical motor areas in healthy humans.

Authors:  Antonella Conte; Francesca Gilio; Ennio Iezzi; Vittorio Frasca; Maurizio Inghilleri; Alfredo Berardelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Operant conditioning of the tibialis anterior motor evoked potential in people with and without chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Aiko K Thompson; Rachel H Cote; Janice M Sniffen; Jodi A Brangaccio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Excitatory and inhibitory after-effects after repetitive magnetic transcranial stimulation (rTMS) in normal subjects.

Authors:  F Gilio; A Conte; N Vanacore; V Frasca; M Inghilleri; A Berardelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 2.064

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.