Literature DB >> 10882818

Acute and subchronic toxicity of sucralose.

L A Goldsmith1.   

Abstract

The toxicity of sucralose has been evaluated in acute and subchronic toxicity studies. Acute oral toxicity studies in male and female mice and male rats documented no deaths or treatment-related signs at doses of 16g/kg for mice and 10g/kg for rats. Sucralose was administered to male and female rats for 4 and 8 weeks at dietary concentrations of 1.0, 2.5 or 5.0%. Achieved dose ranges (mg/kg/day) for the respective dietary levels were 737-1287, 1865-3218 and 2794-6406. There were no toxicologically significant effects observed at the 1.0% or 2.5% dietary levels. However, decreases in food consumption, body weight gain and selected organ weights and ratios as well as splenic and thymic histopathologic changes occurred in rats administered 5.0% for 4 or 8 weeks. A gavage study wherein doses of 0, 750, 1500 or 3000mg/kg/day were administered to male and female rats for 26 weeks investigated further the observations from the dietary study as well as general subchronic toxicity. The gavage study documented no sucralose-related toxicity. These results implicate the reduced palatability and digestibility of diets containing high concentrations of sucralose seen in the diet study as the cause for the decreased food consumption and other accompanying alterations. Dose selection for chronic toxicity studies in rats took into consideration the effect of high concentrations of sucralose on digestion and food consumption and the limitations that would be imposed on subsequent studies. In male and female dogs, no sucralose-related adverse effects were observed following the dietary administration of 0.3, 1.0 or 3.0% for 12 months achieving doses of approximately 90, 300 and 900mg/kg/day respectively. These studies establish that sucralose is non-toxic in rodents following acute oral administration. The rat no-observed-adverse-effect level ranged between 2.5 and 5.0% following subchronic dietary administration. A 3.0% dietary concentration equivalent to a dose of 900mg/kg/day produced no adverse effects in beagle dogs when fed for 12 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10882818     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-6915(00)00028-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  11 in total

1.  Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota.

Authors:  Jotham Suez; Tal Korem; David Zeevi; Gili Zilberman-Schapira; Christoph A Thaiss; Ori Maza; David Israeli; Niv Zmora; Shlomit Gilad; Adina Weinberger; Yael Kuperman; Alon Harmelin; Ilana Kolodkin-Gal; Hagit Shapiro; Zamir Halpern; Eran Segal; Eran Elinav
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sucralose administered in feed, beginning prenatally through lifespan, induces hematopoietic neoplasias in male swiss mice.

Authors:  Soffritti M; Padovani M; Tibaldi E; Falcioni L; Manservisi F; Lauriola M; Bua L; Manservigi M; Belpoggi F
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-01-29

3.  Rationale for further medical and health research on high-potency sweeteners.

Authors:  Susan S Schiffman
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  The 90-day oral toxicity of d-psicose in male Wistar rats.

Authors:  Tatsuhiro Matsuo; Reika Ishii; Yoko Shirai
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.114

5.  Non-caloric sweetener provides magnetic resonance imaging contrast for cancer detection.

Authors:  Puneet Bagga; Mohammad Haris; Kevin D'Aquilla; Neil E Wilson; Francesco M Marincola; Mitchell D Schnall; Hari Hariharan; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 5.531

6.  The study on long-term toxicity of d-psicose in rats.

Authors:  Kanako Yagi; Tatsuhiro Matsuo
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.114

Review 7.  Sucralose, a synthetic organochlorine sweetener: overview of biological issues.

Authors:  Susan S Schiffman; Kristina I Rother
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.393

Review 8.  Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies.

Authors:  P J Rogers; P S Hogenkamp; C de Graaf; S Higgs; A Lluch; A R Ness; C Penfold; R Perry; P Putz; M R Yeomans; D J Mela
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 9.  Sucralose Non-Carcinogenicity: A Review of the Scientific and Regulatory Rationale.

Authors:  Colin Berry; David Brusick; Samuel M Cohen; Jerry F Hardisty; V Lee Grotz; Gary M Williams
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.900

Review 10.  Low-/No-Calorie Sweeteners: A Review of Global Intakes.

Authors:  Danika Martyn; Maryse Darch; Ashley Roberts; Han Youl Lee; Tina Yaqiong Tian; Naoko Kaburagi; Pablo Belmar
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.