Literature DB >> 10882817

Sucralose: assessment of teratogenic potential in the rat and the rabbit.

J W Kille1, J M Tesh, P A McAnulty, F W Ross, C R Willoughby, G P Bailey, O K Wilby, S A Tesh.   

Abstract

The teratogenic potential of sucralose was examined following gavage administration to pregnant rats and rabbits during organogenesis. Groups of 20 mated rats were dosed on days 6-15 of gestation inclusive at 500, 1000 or 2000mg/kg/day; groups of 16 to 18 inseminated rabbits were dosed on days 6 to 19 of gestation inclusive at 175, 350 or 700mg/kg/day following preliminary studies at higher doses. Concurrent control groups received vehicle alone. Rats were killed on day 21 and rabbits on day 29 of gestation. Foetuses were evaluated at necropsy and after processing for possible soft tissue and skeletal alterations. There was no evidence of teratogenicity for either species. The only observed response to treatment in rats was a slight increase in water intake. Some adult rabbits receiving 700mg/kg/day exhibited marked gastrointestinal disturbance, also seen at higher doses in preliminary studies. Gastrointestinal effects such as these occur non-specifically in response to high doses of poorly absorbed compounds, and in the present study were considered to be responsible for two maternal deaths and four abortions. Full evaluation of rabbit foetuses in the main study (up to 700mg/kg/day) and necropsy of foetuses in a preliminary study with pregnant animals (up to 1000mg/kg/day) showed no evidence of adverse foetal response to sucralose. These teratology studies in both pregnant rodent and non-rodent animal models demonstrate that maternal consumption of high levels of sucralose during the period of organogenesis has no effect on normal foetal development in the rat or rabbit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10882817     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-6915(00)00027-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  6 in total

1.  Sugar substitutes during pregnancy.

Authors:  Eliza Pope; Gideon Koren; Pina Bozzo
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Effects of Low-Dose Non-Caloric Sweetener Consumption on Gut Microbiota in Mice.

Authors:  Takashi Uebanso; Ai Ohnishi; Reiko Kitayama; Ayumi Yoshimoto; Mutsumi Nakahashi; Takaaki Shimohata; Kazuaki Mawatari; Akira Takahashi
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Is a Non-Caloric Sweetener-Free Diet Good to Treat Functional Gastrointestinal Disorder Symptoms? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Viridiana Montsserrat Mendoza-Martínez; Mónica Rocío Zavala-Solares; Aranza Jhosadara Espinosa-Flores; Karen Lorena León-Barrera; Raúl Alcántara-Suárez; José Damián Carrillo-Ruíz; Galileo Escobedo; Ernesto Roldan-Valadez; Marcela Esquivel-Velázquez; Guillermo Meléndez-Mier; Nallely Bueno-Hernández
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 4.  Sucralose, a synthetic organochlorine sweetener: overview of biological issues.

Authors:  Susan S Schiffman; Kristina I Rother
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.393

Review 5.  Artificial Sweeteners: A Systematic Review and Primer for Gastroenterologists.

Authors:  Marisa Spencer; Amit Gupta; Lauren Van Dam; Carol Shannon; Stacy Menees; William D Chey
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 4.924

Review 6.  Neuroendocrine and Metabolic Effects of Low-Calorie and Non-Calorie Sweeteners.

Authors:  Eleonora Moriconi; Alessandra Feraco; Vincenzo Marzolla; Marco Infante; Mauro Lombardo; Andrea Fabbri; Massimiliano Caprio
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 5.555

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.