| Literature DB >> 10882675 |
S Phillips1, T C Granade, C P Pau, D Candal, D J Hu, B S Parekh.
Abstract
We evaluated six rapid tests for their sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection using 241 specimens (172 HIV-1 positive, 69 HIV-1 negative) representing different HIV-1 subtypes (A [n = 40], B [n = 47], C [n = 28], E [n = 42], and F [n = 7]). HIVCHEK, Multispot, RTD and SeroStrip were 100% sensitive and specific. Capillus failed to identify two of eight subtype C specimens (overall sensitivity of 98. 85%), while the SUDS test (the only test approved by the Food and Drug Administration) gave false-positive results for 5 of 69 seronegative specimens (specificity of 93.24%). Our results suggest that although rapid tests perform well in general, it may be prudent to evaluate a rapid test for sensitivity and specificity in a local population prior to its widespread use.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2000 PMID: 10882675 PMCID: PMC95937 DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.7.4.698-699.2000
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Diagn Lab Immunol ISSN: 1071-412X