Literature DB >> 10881619

Stimulus-response compatibility for absolute and relative spatial correspondence in reaching and in button pressing.

J F Stins1, C F Michaels.   

Abstract

Three experiments tested whether stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility might be a function of absolute (as opposed to relative) spatial correspondence--that is, the distance between a stimulus and the place of response. Experiment 1 studied reaching movements toward one of two targets in response to one of six visual stimuli. Stimulus-response pairs that shared relative position were faster than those that did not, and reaction time was faster when the stimulus and one of the potential targets were in close proximity. In Experiment 2 the same effects were found when the hands started from a different position, implicating stimulus-target distance, rather than stimulus-hand distance as the critical variable. Experiment 3 employed keypress responses instead of reaches, and the distance effect was nearly absent. The implications of these results are discussed in terms of categorical (e.g. left-right) vs. quantitative (e.g. distance) S-R variables in spatial compatibility.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10881619     DOI: 10.1080/713755894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  6 in total

1.  Stability of rhythmic visuo-motor tracking does not depend on relative velocity.

Authors:  Aymar de Rugy; Olivier Oullier; Jean-Jacques Temprado
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  How the physicality of space affects how we think about time.

Authors:  Jennifer Kolesari; Laura Carlson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-04

3.  Action plans produce separate Simon effects for picking up and transporting objects.

Authors:  James D Miles; Jessica K Witt; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-12-18

4.  Spatial coding for the Simon effect in visual search.

Authors:  Dexuan Zhang; Xiaolin Zhou; Giuseppe di Pellegrino; Elisabetta Ladavas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  What is 'anti' about anti-reaches? Reference frames selectively affect reaction times and endpoint variability.

Authors:  Stephanie Westendorff; Alexander Gail
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Need for space: the key distance effect depends on spatial stimulus configurations.

Authors:  Melanie Jonas; Owino Eloka; Julia Stephan; Volker H Franz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.