Literature DB >> 10875993

Relaparoscopy for the detection and treatment of complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

S P Dexter1, G V Miller, D Davides, I G Martin, H M Sue Ling, P M Sagar, M Larvin, M J McMahon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparotomy remains the commonest intervention in patients with abdominal complications of laparoscopic surgery. Our own policy is to employ relaparoscopy to avoid diagnostic delay and unnecessary laparotomy. The results of using this policy in patients with suspected intra-abdominal complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy are reviewed.
METHODS: Data were collected from laparoscopic cholecystectomies carried out by five consultant surgeons in one center. Details of relaparoscopy for complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: Thirteen patients underwent relaparoscopy within 7 days of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for intra-abdominal bleeding (2 patients) or abdominal pain (11 patients). The causes of pain were subhepatic haematoma (1), acute pancreatitis (1), small bowel injury (1), and minor bile leakage (6). In 2 patients no cause was identified. Twelve patients were managed laparoscopically and 1 patient required laparotomy. Median stay after relaparoscopy was 7 days (range 2 to 19).
CONCLUSIONS: Exploratory laparotomy can be avoided by prompt relaparoscopy in the majority of patients with abdominal complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10875993     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00345-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  9 in total

1.  "Relaparoscopic" management of surgical complications: The experience of an Emergency Center.

Authors:  Antonino Agrusa; Giuseppe Frazzetta; Daniela Chianetta; Silvia Di Giovanni; Leonardo Gulotta; Giuseppe Di Buno; Vincenzo Sorce; Giorgio Romano; Gaspare Gulotta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  [Relaparoscopy as an alternative to laparotomy for laparoscopic complications].

Authors:  I Leister; H Becker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Reoperation following minimally invasive surgery: are the "rules" different?

Authors:  James T McCormick; Clifford L Simmang
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-11

4.  Reoperation of biliary tract by laparoscopy: experiences with 39 cases.

Authors:  Li-Bo Li; Xiu-Jun Cai; Yi-Ping Mou; Qi Wei
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Early relaparoscopy for management of suspected postoperative complications.

Authors:  Boris Kirshtein; Aviel Roy-Shapira; Sergey Domchik; Solly Mizrahi; Leonid Lantsberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Relaparoscopy for management of postoperative complications following colorectal surgery: ten years experience in a single center.

Authors:  Diego Cuccurullo; Felice Pirozzi; Antonio Sciuto; Umberto Bracale; Camillo La Barbera; Francesco Galante; Francesco Corcione
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A ten-year study on non-surgical treatment of postoperative bile leakage.

Authors:  Xiao-Peng Chen; Shu-You Peng; Cheng-Hong Peng; Yin-Bi Liu; Liu-Bin Shi; Xian-Chuan Jiang; Hong-Wei Shen; Yuan-Liang Xu; Shu-Bin Fang; Jing Rui; Xiang-Hou Xia; Guo-Hai Zhao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Entirely laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: lymph node yield and resection margins.

Authors:  Abeezar I Sarela
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic surgery complications: postoperative peritonitis.

Authors:  L Drăghici; I Drăghici; A Ungureanu; C Copăescu; M Popescu; C Dragomirescu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2012-09-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.