Literature DB >> 10875577

The proximal probe in esophageal pH monitoring: development of a normative database.

D A Vincent1, J D Garrett, S L Radionoff, L A Reussner, C R Stasney.   

Abstract

Healthy volunteers without symptoms of either gastroesophageal reflux or laryngopharyngeal reflux and without abnormalities on laryngologic examination were recruited for esophageal pH monitoring. Thirty subjects underwent ambulatory 24-hour double-channel pH probe monitoring to establish normative data for the upper probe, which was positioned just above the upper esophageal sphincter. Data were analyzed excluding meal periods plus 2 minutes of postprandial time. The mean, standard deviation, median, and 95th percentile were calculated for various reflux parameters for the following intervals: total study duration, upright time, supine time, and postprandial time. Normal subjects display physiologic reflux above the upper esophageal sphincter (median one event, 95th percentile 6.9 events), and 80.4% of these events occur in the upright position. The reflux area index (RAI) appears to be the most useful parameter to measure laryngopharyngeal reflux severity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10875577     DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(00)80033-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  21 in total

1.  [The possibilities of reflux disease diagnosis by the ear, nose and throat specialist].

Authors:  P Jecker
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Determination of normal values of extraesophageal reflux in 24-h two-channel pH testing].

Authors:  P Jecker; R Schuon; C Morales; M Wohlfeil; S Rassouli; W J Mann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Hoarseness and laryngopharyngeal reflux: a cause and effect relationship or coincidence?

Authors:  Ozcan Ozturk; Ferhan Oz; Baris Karakullukcu; Fatih Oghan; Ender Guclu; Mehmet Ada
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  [Extraesophageal reflux. Overview and discussion of a new method for pH monitoring].

Authors:  M Jungheim; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Management of patients with coexisting obstructive sleep apnea and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.

Authors:  A Eryılmaz; L Erişen; U L Demir; F Kasapoglu; O A Ozmen; A Ursavas; M Kıyıcı; I Hızalan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Does laryngopharyngeal reflux cause intraoral burning sensations? A preliminary study.

Authors:  Sven Becker; Christine Schmidt; Alexander Berghaus; Uta Tschiesner; Bernhard Olzowy; Oliver Reichel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  [Repeated dual-probe pH monitoring as a diagnostic tool to control therapy for laryngopharyngeal reflux].

Authors:  O Reichel; F Durst; G Rasp; A Berghaus
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  The management of periprosthetic leakage in the presence of supra-oesophageal reflux after prosthetic voice rehabilitation.

Authors:  Kai J Lorenz; L Grieser; T Ehrhart; H Maier
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), extraesophageal reflux (EER) and recurrent chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Peter Jecker; Lisa A Orloff; Miriam Wohlfeil; Wolf J Mann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  Voice outcomes of laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: a systematic review of 1483 patients.

Authors:  Jérôme R Lechien; Camille Finck; Pedro Costa de Araujo; Kathy Huet; Véronique Delvaux; Myriam Piccaluga; Bernard Harmegnies; Sven Saussez
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.