Literature DB >> 10874651

Direct and indirect costs of rheumatoid arthritis to an employer.

H G Birnbaum, M Barton, P E Greenberg, T Sisitsky, R Auerbach, L A Wanke, M C Buatti.   

Abstract

This study is among the first to estimate the overall economic burden of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from an employer perspective. The annual, per capita cost of RA was determined for beneficiaries of a major employer by analyzing medical, pharmaceutical, and disability claims data. The incremental costs related to RA were determined by matching RA patients to a case-control group of individuals with no recorded RA treatment. The utilization of health care services as well as the rate of disability among RA patients was substantially higher than among the controls. For example, annual, per capita employer expenditures for RA employees with disability were almost 3 times those for their controls ($17,822 vs $6131, respectively). Treatment to address not only the severity but also the progression of RA may substantially reduce overall employer expenditures for this disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10874651     DOI: 10.1097/00043764-200006000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  10 in total

Review 1.  International variation in resource utilisation and treatment costs for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Hubertus Rosery; Rito Bergemann; Stefanie Maxion-Bergemann
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Changes in utilization and costs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 1997 to 2006.

Authors:  Howard G Birnbaum; Crystal Pike; Ritesh Banerjee; Tracy Waldman; Mary Cifaldi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Cost-effectiveness of adding magnetic resonance imaging to rheumatoid arthritis management.

Authors:  Lisa G Suter; Liana Fraenkel; R Scott Braithwaite
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-11

4.  Cardiovascular and economic outcomes after initiation of lipid-lowering therapy with atorvastatin vs simvastatin in an employed population.

Authors:  Ross J Simpson; James Signorovitch; Howard Birnbaum; Jasmina Ivanova; Cristina Connolly; Yohanne Kidolezi; Andreas Kuznik
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 5.  Infliximab: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson; Rachel H Foster
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Risk: benefit profile of etanercept in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis.

Authors:  Roy Fleischmann; Imran Iqbal
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  Epidemiology and burden of illness of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Tore K Kvien
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Rodent preclinical models for developing novel antiarthritic molecules: comparative biology and preferred methods for evaluating efficacy.

Authors:  Brad Bolon; Marina Stolina; Caroline King; Scot Middleton; Jill Gasser; Debra Zack; Ulrich Feige
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-12-28

9.  Burden of rheumatoid arthritis among US Medicare population: co-morbidities, health-care resource utilization and costs.

Authors:  Chieh-I Chen; Li Wang; Wenhui Wei; Huseyin Yuce; Kristine Phillips
Journal:  Rheumatol Adv Pract       Date:  2018-02-21

10.  Quantifying the Employer Burden of Persistent Musculoskeletal Pain at a Large Employer in the United Kingdom: A Non-interventional, Retrospective Study of Rolls-Royce Employee Data.

Authors:  David Roomes; Lucy Abraham; Rachel Russell; Craig Beck; Kate Halsby; Robert Wood; Megan O'Brien; Lucy Massey; Kim Burton
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.306

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.