Literature DB >> 22379953

Changes in utilization and costs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 1997 to 2006.

Howard G Birnbaum1, Crystal Pike, Ritesh Banerjee, Tracy Waldman, Mary Cifaldi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that often results in joint pain, inflammation and bone erosions. Perhaps the most notable change in RA treatment during the last decade is the advent of biologics, and, in particular, anti-tumour necrosis factor agents. Given these advances, it is useful to assess how healthcare and work-loss costs of patients with RA have changed.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess changes in healthcare utilization and costs from 1997 to 2006 for patients diagnosed with RA.
METHODS: Two cohorts (1997 and 2006) of patients with RA and matched controls were identified from two administrative claims databases along with subsamples of employed patients and matched controls. The analysis focused on the more homogeneous employee subsample. We compared annual excess co-morbidity rates, resource utilization and healthcare and work-loss costs per patient between the 1997 (n = 279) and 2006 cohorts (n = 837) with difference-in-differences methodology. Results with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: In the employee subsample, there were no statistically significant differences in the excess prevalence of non-RA co-morbidities or Charlson Co-morbidity Index results, except for cardiovascular disease, which decreased by 11.1%. Excess number of ED visits and days hospitalized decreased by 1.1 visits/patient and 0.9 days/patient, respectively, while rheumatologist visits increased by 0.9 visits/patient. Excess per-patient direct costs were unchanged. However, drug costs increased by $US633/patient, but medical costs decreased by $US618/patient (not significant) [year 2006 values].
CONCLUSION: For employed patients with RA, there were significant reductions in per-patient excess hospital days, as well as ED visits, and no changes in excess total direct costs over time. New treatments introduced during the study period may be associated with cost savings that offset changes in employee utilization of drug and medical services. In addition, the reductions in excess ED visits and hospital days suggest improvements in patient quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22379953     DOI: 10.2165/11589470-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  34 in total

1.  Substantial gains in bias reduction from matching with a variable number of controls.

Authors:  K Ming; P R Rosenbaum
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Trial in Rheumatoid Arthritis with Concomitant Therapy Study Group.

Authors:  P E Lipsky; D M van der Heijde; E W St Clair; D E Furst; F C Breedveld; J R Kalden; J S Smolen; M Weisman; P Emery; M Feldmann; G R Harriman; R N Maini
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Which medical conditions account for the rise in health care spending?

Authors:  Kenneth E Thorpe; Curtis S Florence; Peter Joski
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jul-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Richard G Frank; Zhonghe Li; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Software for optimal matching in observational studies.

Authors:  E J Bergstralh; J L Kosanke; S J Jacobsen
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Infliximab (chimeric anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody) versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexate: a randomised phase III trial. ATTRACT Study Group.

Authors:  R Maini; E W St Clair; F Breedveld; D Furst; J Kalden; M Weisman; J Smolen; P Emery; G Harriman; M Feldmann; P Lipsky
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-12-04       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Indirect and nonmedical costs among people with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis compared with nonarthritic controls.

Authors:  S E Gabriel; C S Crowson; M E Campion; W M O'Fallon
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  The PREMIER study: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or adalimumab alone in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis who had not had previous methotrexate treatment.

Authors:  Ferdinand C Breedveld; Michael H Weisman; Arthur F Kavanaugh; Stanley B Cohen; Karel Pavelka; Ronald van Vollenhoven; John Sharp; John L Perez; George T Spencer-Green
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-01

Review 9.  Comorbidities in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Kaleb Michaud; Frederick Wolfe
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.098

10.  Sex differences in rheumatoid arthritis: more than meets the eye...

Authors:  Ronald F van Vollenhoven
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  9 in total

1.  Medical Care Costs Associated With Rheumatoid Arthritis in the US: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Hresko; Tzu-Chieh Lin; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 2.  Do Biologic Therapies for Rheumatoid Arthritis Offset Treatment-Related Resource Utilization and Cost? A Review of the Literature and an Instrumental Variable Analysis.

Authors:  Nick Bansback; Eric Fu; Huiying Sun; Daphne Guh; Wei Zhang; Diane Lacaille; Katherine Milbers; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Variability in the frequency of rheumatology consultations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Spain.

Authors:  R Lopez-Gonzalez; D Seoane-Mato; S Perez-Vicente; M A Martin-Martinez; F Sanchez-Alonso; L Silva-Fernandez
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in a National, Privately Insured Population: Utilization, Expenditures, and Price Trends.

Authors:  Christopher B Atzinger; Jeff J Guo
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2017-02

Review 5.  Comparative effectiveness of biologics for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho; Nigel Armstrong; Ramesh Arjunji; Rob Riemsma; Gill Worthy; Rita Ganguly; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  The temporal association between hospital admissions, biological therapy usage and direct health care costs in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  Khalid Almutairi; Johannes Nossent; David B Preen; Helen Keen; Charles Inderjeeth
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 3.580

7.  Profiling the patients visiting the emergency room for musculoskeletal complaints: characteristics and outcomes.

Authors:  Mattia Bellan; Rossella Molinari; Luigi Castello; Daniele Sola; Antonello Gibbin; Giulia Guaschino; Roberta Pedrazzoli; Alessia Puma; Mario Pirisi; Gian Carlo Avanzi; Pier Paolo Sainaghi
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Health care costs of rheumatoid arthritis: A longitudinal population study.

Authors:  Mark Tatangelo; George Tomlinson; J Michael Paterson; Edward Keystone; Nick Bansback; Claire Bombardier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of Healthcare Utilization and Costs Between RA Patients Receiving Biological and Conventional Synthetic DMARDs: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Der-Yuan Chen; Fun Yu; Li-Wen Tuan; Chao-Hsiun Tang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.810

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.