Literature DB >> 10872995

An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system.

U Pallesen1, J W van Dijken.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate Cerec CAD/CAM inlays processed of two industrially made machinable ceramics during an 8-yr follow-up period. Each of 16 patients received two similar ceramic inlays. Half the number of the inlays were made of a feldspathic (Vita Mark II) and the other of a glass ceramic (Dicor MGC) block. The inlays were luted with a dual resin composite and evaluated clinically using modified USPHS criteria at baseline, 8 months, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 8 yr, and indirectly using models. At baseline, 84% of the inlays were estimated as optimal and 16% as acceptable. Postoperative sensitivity was reported by one patient for 8 months. Of the 32 inlays evaluated during the 8 yr, 3 failed due to fracture of the material. No secondary caries was found adjacent to the inlays. No significant differences in the clinical performance were found between inlays made of the two ceramics. It can be concluded that the CAD/CAM inlays processed of the two ceramics functioned well during the 8-yr follow-up period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10872995     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.108003239.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci        ISSN: 0909-8836            Impact factor:   2.612


  17 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of ceramic inlays.

Authors:  M Hayashi; N H F Wilson; C A Yeung; H V Worthington
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2002-12-21       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation.

Authors:  Ulla Pallesen; Vibeke Qvist
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-05-10       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Seven-year clinical performance of CEREC-2 all-ceramic CAD/CAM restorations placed within deeply destroyed teeth.

Authors:  Matthias J Roggendorf; Bianka Kunzi; Johannes Ebert; Hubert C Roggendorf; Roland Frankenberger; Sven M Reich
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  A digital process for additive manufacturing of occlusal splints: a clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Mika Salmi; Kaija-Stiina Paloheimo; Jukka Tuomi; Tuula Ingman; Antti Mäkitie
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Direct metal laser sintering: a digitised metal casting technology.

Authors:  K Vijay Venkatesh; V Vidyashree Nandini
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-02-05

6.  Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue.

Authors:  Petra C Guess; Thaleia Vagkopoulou; Yu Zhang; Martin Wolkewitz; Joerg R Strub
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Edge chipping test in dentistry: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Suzane Boa Nova Brandeburski; Marina Lermenn Vidal; Kaue Collares; Yu Zhang; Alvaro Della Bona
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Marginal Integrity of CAD/CAM Ceramic Crowns Using Two Different Finish Line Designs.

Authors:  Jaber Hussain Akbar; Ridwaan Omar; Yacoub Al-Tarakmah
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 1.927

9.  Rapid tooling method for soft customized removable oral appliances.

Authors:  Mika Salmi; Jukka Tuomi; Rauno Sirkkanen; Tuula Ingman; Antti Mäkitie
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2012-05-09

10.  Considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: a review.

Authors:  Christa D Hopp; Martin F Land
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2013-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.