Literature DB >> 10872566

The efficacy and tolerability of losartan versus atenolol in patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Losartan ISH Investigators Group.

C Farsang1, J Garcia-Puig, J Niegowska, A Q Baiz, F Vrijens, G Bortman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of angiotensin II (Ang II) antagonist losartan and the beta-blocker atenolol in the treatment of patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) after 16 weeks of treatment.
METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, multi-country study was carried out in 273 patients with ISH. Patients with a sitting systolic blood pressure (SiSBP) of 160-205 mmHg, and a sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) < 90 mmHg at screening and at placebo baseline were subjected to a 4-week placebo period and then randomly grouped to receive 50 mg losartan or 50 mg atenolol once daily for 16 weeks. At 8 and 12 weeks, patients not controlled (SiDBP > or = 160 mmHg) were given additional treatment of 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) once daily.
RESULTS: Similar significant reductions in SiSBPs (mean +/- SD) were obtained with 50 mg losartan and 50 mg atenolol, from 173.7 +/- 10.3 and 173.5 +/- 10.7 mmHg at baseline to 149.0 +/- 15.5 and 148.2 +/- 15.3 mmHg after 16 weeks of losartan or atenolol treatment respectively. Sixty-seven percent of the losartan-treated and 64% of the atenolol-treated patients remained on monotherapy throughout the study. Only 1.5% of the losartan-treated patients withdrew because of a clinical adverse event (CAE) compared with 7.2% in the atenolol-treatment group (P= 0.035). Drug-related CAEs were observed significantly more frequently with atenolol than with losartan treatment (20.3 versus 10.4%; P = 0.029).
CONCLUSION: It is concluded that 50 mg losartan and 50 mg atenolol produced comparable reductions in SiSBP in patients with ISH but losartan was better tolerated. This is the first demonstration of the therapeutic value of selective Ang II receptor blockade with losartan in the treatment of ISH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10872566     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200018060-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  6 in total

1.  Chronobiologically explored effects of Telmisartan.

Authors:  Pavel Prikryl; Germaine Cornélissen; Jiri Neubauer; Pavel Prikryl; Zdenek Karpisek; Yoshihiko Watanabe; Kuniaki Otsuka; Franz Halberg
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens       Date:  2005 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 1.749

Review 2.  Isolated systolic hypertension as a treatable risk factor.

Authors:  P A van Zwieten
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 3.  Hypertension in the elderly.

Authors:  M Pestana
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Treating systolic hypertension in the very elderly with valsartan-hydrochlorothiazide vs. either monotherapy: ValVET primary results.

Authors:  Joseph L Izzo; Howard S Weintraub; Daniel A Duprez; Das Purkayastha; Dion Zappe; Rita Samuel; William C Cushman
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  The effect of a losartan-based treatment regimen on isolated systolic hypertension.

Authors:  William C Cushman; William E Brady; Lisa P Gazdick; Robert K Zeldin
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Should beta blockers be used in the treatment of hypertension in the elderly?

Authors:  L Michael Prisant
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.