Literature DB >> 10870910

Psychophysiological responses to imagined infidelity: the specific innate modular view of jealousy reconsidered.

C R Harris1.   

Abstract

Three studies measured psychophysiological reactivity (heart rate, blood pressure, and electrodermal activity) while participants imagined a mate's infidelity. The specific innate modular theory of gender differences in jealousy hypothesizes that men are upset by sexual infidelity and women are upset by emotional infidelity, because of having faced different adaptive challenges (cuckoldry and loss of a mate's resources, respectively). This view was not supported. In men, sexual-infidelity imagery elicited greater reactivity than emotional-infidelity imagery. But, sexual imagery elicited greater reactivity even when infidelity was not involved, suggesting that the differential reactivity may not specifically index greater jealousy. In two studies with reasonable power, women did not respond more strongly to emotional infidelity. Moreover, women with committed sexual relationship experience showed reactivity patterns similar to those of men. Hypothetical infidelity self-reports were unrelated to reactivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10870910     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.6.1082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  8 in total

1.  Estrogens and relationship jealousy.

Authors:  D C Geary; M C DeSoto; M K Hoard; M S Sheldon; M L Cooper
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2001-12

2.  Upset in response to a Sibling's partner's infidelities.

Authors:  Richard L Michalski; Todd K Shackelford; Catherine A Salmon
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2007-03

3.  Romantic jealousy in early adulthood and in later life.

Authors:  Todd K Shackelford; Martin Voracek; David P Schmitt; David M Buss; Viviana A Weekes-Shackelford; Richard L Michalski
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2004-09

4.  Effect of Relationship Status on Response Times to Sexual and Romantic Stimuli Among Japanese Undergraduates in a Memory Task.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kato
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-10-20

5.  Compersion: When Jealousy-Inducing Situations Don't (Just) Induce Jealousy.

Authors:  Rhonda N Balzarini; James N McDonald; Taylor Kohut; Justin J Lehmiller; Bjarne M Holmes; Jennifer J Harman
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-05-26

6.  Testing the sexual imagination hypothesis for gender differences in response to infidelity.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kato
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-11-29

7.  Men's Mate Value Correlates with a Less Restricted Sociosexual Orientation: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Steven Arnocky; Jessica Desrochers; Amanda Rotella; Graham Albert; Carolyn Hodges-Simeon; Ashley Locke; Jacob Belanger; Danielle Lynch; Benjamin Kelly
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-07-29

8.  It's not just lunch: extra-pair commensality can trigger sexual jealousy.

Authors:  Kevin M Kniffin; Brian Wansink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.