Literature DB >> 10870150

Comparison between the outer table and intracortical methods of obtaining autogenous bone graft from the iliac crest.

Y Mirovsky1, M G Neuwirth.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study in two groups of patients selected randomly.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether keeping the outer and inner cortices of the ilium intact, while obtaining bone graft, would result in reduced postoperative bleeding and less postoperative pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Donor site complications after harvesting bone from the iliac crest are frequent. They comprise pain and bleeding related to the large bone exposed, injuries to the cluneal nerve, and sacroiliac instability.
METHOD: Sixty patients who were admitted for elective fusion of lumbar segments were included in the study. In half of them, the iliac bone graft was taken in the outer Table method (group A), which included the outer cortex and the cancellous bone beneath, and in the remaining 30 patients only the cancellous bone from between the cortices was collected (group B). The amount of bone harvested, and the time taken to obtain it, were measured, as was the blood volume in the drains. At fixed intervals after surgery and up to 2 years thereafter, the patients were asked to grade the severity of pain in their back and at the donor site.
RESULTS: Two years after surgery, 22% of the patients in group A and 17% of the patients in group B reported to have significant pain at the donor site. This difference was not found to be statistically significant, nor was the postoperative bleeding. The average amount of bone harvested in group A was 36 grams compared with 25.7 grams in group B, taking 14 minutes and 20.3 minutes, respectively, to harvest it. These differences were found to be statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Preserving the iliac cortices, while obtaining bone graft, does not reduce the postoperative bleeding or the severity of pain at the donor site. In the intraosseous method, less bone is harvested and longer duration of surgery is required, compared with that of the outer Table method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10870150     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200007010-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Bone harvesting from the iliac crest].

Authors:  M Jäger; B Westhoff; A Wild; R Krauspe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Anterior cervical spinal fusion with the Intromed ZWE System: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Johannes Schröder; Florian Grosse-Dresselhaus; Christoph Schul; Hansdetlef Wassmann
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Impact of iliac crest bone graft harvesting on fusion rates and postoperative pain during instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Constantin Schizas; Dimitrios Triantafyllopoulos; Victor Kosmopoulos; Kosmas Stafylas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Comparison of traditional and intrafascial iliac crest bone-graft harvesting in lumbar spinal surgery.

Authors:  Murat Bezer; Bariş Kocaoğlu; Nuri Aydin; Osman Güven
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Spontaneous posterior iliac crest regeneration enabling second bone graft harvest; a case report.

Authors:  Elias C Papadopoulos; Patrick F O'Leary; Ioannis P Pappou; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2009-06-17

6.  Iliac crest reconstruction to reduce donor-site morbidity: technical note.

Authors:  Joseph Richard Dusseldorp; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Failure of reconstitution of open-section, posterior iliac-wing bone graft donor sites after lumbar spinal fusion. Observations with implications for the etiology of donor site pain.

Authors:  Drew A Bednar; Waleed Al-Tunaib
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The Efficiency of Bone Marrow Aspiration for the Harvest of Connective Tissue Progenitors from the Human Iliac Crest.

Authors:  Thomas E Patterson; Cynthia Boehm; Chizu Nakamoto; Richard Rozic; Esteban Walker; Nicolas S Piuzzi; George F Muschler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Prospective evaluation of chronic pain associated with posterior autologous iliac crest bone graft harvest and its effect on postoperative outcome.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Julia F Martha; Paulette Kowalski; David A Wang; Rita Bode; Ling Li; David H Kim
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Anatomical etiology of "pseudo-sciatica" from superior cluneal nerve entrapment: a laboratory investigation.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Konno; Yoichi Aota; Hiroshi Kuniya; Tomoyuki Saito; Ning Qu; Shogo Hayashi; Shinichi Kawata; Masahiro Itoh
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.