Literature DB >> 10869641

Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose and dose-optimization regimens of sublingual apomorphine versus placebo in men with erectile dysfunction. The Apomorphine Study Group.

E Dula1, W Keating, P F Siami, A Edmonds, J O'neil, S Buttler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A sublingual (SL) formulation of apomorphine has been developed and found effective in penile erectile dysfunction (ED). This study assessed the efficacy and safety of several doses of apomorphine SL in a dose-optimization schedule compared with placebo.
METHODS: In this 8-week, multicenter, double-blind clinical trial, 569 patients were randomized to four groups: a dose-optimization group in which patients began with 2 mg, increased or decreased the dosage as needed for 4 weeks, and thereafter maintained an optimal dose for 4 weeks; two fixed-dose groups of either 5 or 6 mg; and a placebo group. Efficacy was assessed by patient and partner responses to home-use questionnaires about sexual function and activity and by responses to the International Index of Erectile Function and the Brief Sexual Function Inventory.
RESULTS: In all apomorphine SL groups, a significantly higher percentage of patients compared with the placebo group achieved and maintained an erection firm enough for intercourse (48% to 53% versus 35% for placebo, P < or =0.001) and a significantly higher percentage of attempts resulted in intercourse (45% to 51% versus 33%, P < or =0.001). The responses to the questionnaires completed by the patients and partners were similar. Apomorphine SL was well tolerated; nausea, the most common side effect, was dose related and diminished substantially during the second 4-week period at all doses. The dose-optimization schedule resulted in fewer adverse events without impacting efficacy.
CONCLUSIONS: Apomorphine SL is an effective and safe treatment for ED, with 2 and 4 mg providing the most acceptable therapeutic index.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10869641     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00575-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

Review 1.  Treating erectile dysfunction when PDE5 inhibitors fail.

Authors:  Chelsea N McMahon; Christopher J Smith; Ridwan Shabsigh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-11

Review 2.  A comparative review of apomorphine formulations for erectile dysfunction : recommendations for use in the elderly.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Felix K-H Chun; Andrea Salonia; Giuseppe Zanni; Federico Dehò; Luigi Barbieri; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Treatment of autonomic dysfunction in Parkinson disease and other synucleinopathies.

Authors:  Jose-Alberto Palma; Horacio Kaufmann
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 10.338

4.  Pharmacotherapy of sexual dysfunctions : current status.

Authors:  Ajith Avasthi; Parthasarathy Biswas
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  Activation of dopamine D4 receptors by ABT-724 induces penile erection in rats.

Authors:  Jorge D Brioni; Robert B Moreland; Marlon Cowart; Gin C Hsieh; Andrew O Stewart; Petter Hedlund; Diana L Donnelly-Roberts; Masaki Nakane; James J Lynch; Teodozyi Kolasa; James S Polakowski; Mark A Osinski; Kennan Marsh; Karl-Erik Andersson; James P Sullivan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Oral mucosal drug delivery: clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Jie Zhang; James B Streisand
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  A comparative review of the options for treatment of erectile dysfunction: which treatment for which patient?

Authors:  Konstantinos Hatzimouratidis; Dimitrios G Hatzichristou
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.