Literature DB >> 10869577

Attentional set shifting modulates the target P3b response in the Wisconsin card sorting test.

F Barceló1, J M Muñoz-Céspedes, M A Pozo, F J Rubia.   

Abstract

For years the Wisconsin card sorting test (WCST) has been used as a test of frontal lobe function. Recent event-related potential (ERP) research has shown large differences in the amplitude of P3b responses evoked by early and late trials within each WCST series ([8]: Barceló F., Sanz M., Molina V., Rubia FJ. The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the assessment of frontal function: A validation study with event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia 1997;35:399-408). In this study, 16 normal subjects performed a WCST adaptation to investigate the role of attentional set shifting in these WCST P3b effects. Two control tasks were designed to examine whether early-late WCST P3b changes reflect category selection (attention) or category storage (memory) operations. Results suggest both a sharp P3b attenuation during shift WCST trials, followed by a gradual P3b build-up during post-shift trials. This P3b modulation could not be attributed to selection or storage of simple sensory stimulus dimensions, nor was it observed when the new rule was externally prompted by the first card in the WCST series. Instead, WCST P3b changes seem related to the endogenously generated shift in the perceptual rule used to sort the cards (i.e., the shift in set). The gradual build-up in P3b amplitude paralleled a progressive improvement in sorting efficiency over several post-shift WCST trials. A model based on formal theories of visual attention and attentional set shifting is proposed to account for these effects. The model offers firm grounds for prediction and bridges the gap between related clinical and experimental evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10869577     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00046-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  25 in total

1.  Stimulus and response ERP analyses of a two-level reaction time task.

Authors:  Andres Posada; Pascal Vianin; Marie-Hélène Giard; Nicolas Franck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Executive function and the frontal lobes: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Julie A Alvarez; Eugene Emory
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  At your own peril: an ERP study of voluntary task set selection processes in the medial frontal cortex.

Authors:  Birte U Forstmann; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Jochen Kaiser; Christoph Bledowski
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  At will or not at will: Electrophysiological correlates of preparation for voluntary and instructed task-switching paradigms.

Authors:  Poyu Chen; Shulan Hsieh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

Review 5.  Systematic review of neuroimaging correlates of executive functioning: converging evidence from different clinical populations.

Authors:  Milap A Nowrangi; Constantine Lyketsos; Vani Rao; Cynthia A Munro
Journal:  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.198

6.  Corticolimbic mechanisms in the control of trial and error learning.

Authors:  Phan Luu; Matthew Shane; Nikki L Pratt; Don M Tucker
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Neural correlates of task and source switching: similar or different?

Authors:  Iroise Dumontheil; Sam J Gilbert; Paul W Burgess; Leun J Otten
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Neural substrates of executive dysfunction in fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS): a brain potential study.

Authors:  Jin-Chen Yang; Shiao-Hui Chan; Sara Khan; Andrea Schneider; Rawi Nanakul; Sara Teichholtz; Yu-Qiong Niu; Andreea Seritan; Flora Tassone; Jim Grigsby; Paul J Hagerman; Randi J Hagerman; John M Olichney
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Selective role for striatal and prefrontal regions in processing first trial feedback during single-trial associative learning.

Authors:  James C Eliassen; Martine Lamy; Jane B Allendorfer; Erin Boespflug; Daniel P Bullard; Matthew S Smith; Jing-Huei Lee; Stephen M Strakowski
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Human processing of behaviorally relevant and irrelevant absence of expected rewards: a high-resolution ERP study.

Authors:  Louis Nahum; Damien Gabriel; Armin Schnider
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.