Literature DB >> 10869576

The contribution of recollection and familiarity to yes-no and forced-choice recognition tests in healthy subjects and amnesics.

W Khoe1, N E Kroll, A P Yonelinas, I G Dobbins, R T Knight.   

Abstract

Recent reports suggest that some amnesic patients perform relatively normally on forced-choice recognition memory tests. Their preserved performance may reflect the fact that the test relies more heavily on assessments of familiarity, a process that is relatively preserved in these patients, than do other recognition tests such as yes-no tests, which may rely more on recollection. The current study examined recognition memory using yes-no and forced-choice procedures in control and amnesic patients in order to determine whether the two tasks differentially relied on recollection and familiarity, and whether the extent of the recognition memory deficit observed in amnesia was dependent upon the type of recognition test used to measure performance. Results using the remember-know procedure with healthy subjects showed that there were no substantial differences in recognition accuracy or in the contribution of recollection to these two tasks. Moreover, amnesic patients were not found to perform better on a forced-choice test than on a yes-no test, suggesting that familiarity contributed equally to these two types of recognition test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10869576     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00055-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  17 in total

1.  Predicting individual false alarm rates and signal detection theory: a role for remembering.

Authors:  I G Dobbins; W Khoe; A P Yonelinas; N E Kroll
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

2.  The systematic discrepancy between A' for overall recognition and remembering: a dual-process account.

Authors:  I G Dobbins
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

3.  Production benefits both recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  Jason D Ozubko; Nigel Gopie; Colin M MacLeod
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

4.  Revisiting the role of recollection in item versus forced-choice recognition memory.

Authors:  Gabriel I Cook; Richard L Marsh; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

5.  Familiarity and conceptual priming engage distinct cortical networks.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Paul J Reber; M-Marsel Mesulam; Todd B Parrish; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Accurate forced-choice recognition without awareness of memory retrieval.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Carol L Baym; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Age-related impairment on a forced-choice version of the Mnemonic Similarity Task.

Authors:  Derek J Huffman; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  The contribution of familiarity to recognition memory is a function of test format when using similar foils.

Authors:  Ellen Migo; Daniela Montaldi; Kenneth A Norman; Joel Quamme; Andrew Mayes
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Yes/no recognition, forced-choice recognition, and the human hippocampus.

Authors:  P J Bayley; J T Wixted; R O Hopkins; L R Squire
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Some Memories are Odder than Others: Judgments of Episodic Oddity Violate Known Decision Rules.

Authors:  Akira R O'Connor; Emily N Guhl; Justin C Cox; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.