Literature DB >> 10868772

Marital satisfaction in patients with cancer: does support from intimate partners benefit those who need it the most?

M Hagedoorn1, R G Kuijer, B P Buunk, G M DeJong, T Wobbes, R Sanderman.   

Abstract

This cross-sectional study assessed 3 ways of providing spousal support. Active engagement means involving the patient in discussions and using constructive problem-solving methods; protective buffering means hiding one's concerns; and overprotection refers to underestimation of the patient's capabilities, resulting in unnecessary help and excessive praise for accomplishments. Ratings of received spousal support by 68 patients with cancer revealed findings similar to those of partners' ratings of provided support. The positive association between active engagement and the patient's marital satisfaction was stronger for patients with a rather poor psychological and physical condition than for those with a rather good condition. Furthermore, protective buffering and overprotection were negatively associated with marital satisfaction only when patients experienced relatively high levels of psychological distress or physical limitations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10868772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  44 in total

Review 1.  Biobehavioral outcomes following psychological interventions for cancer patients.

Authors:  Barbara L Andersen
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2002-06

2.  Enacted support during stressful life events in middle and older adulthood: an examination of the interpersonal context.

Authors:  Kira S Birditt; Toni C Antonucci; Lauren Tighe
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-02-06

3.  Antecedents and mediators of physical activity in endometrial cancer survivors: Increasing physical activity through steps to health.

Authors:  Matthew Cox; Cindy Carmack; Daniel Hughes; George Baum; Jubilee Brown; Anuja Jhingran; Karen Lu; Karen Basen-Engquist
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Receiving support as a mixed blessing: evidence for dual effects of support on psychological outcomes.

Authors:  Marci E J Gleason; Masumi Iida; Patrick E Shrout; Niall Bolger
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-05

5.  Dyadic effects of fear of recurrence on the quality of life of cancer survivors and their caregivers.

Authors:  Youngmee Kim; Charles S Carver; Rachel L Spillers; Melissa Love-Ghaffari; Chiew-Kwei Kaw
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Relationship satisfaction in couples confronted with colorectal cancer: the interplay of past and current spousal support.

Authors:  Mariët Hagedoorn; Meirav Dagan; Eli Puterman; Christiaan Hoff; W J H Jeroen Meijerink; Anita Delongis; Robbert Sanderman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-01-11

7.  Common dyadic coping is indirectly related to dietary and exercise adherence via patient and partner diabetes efficacy.

Authors:  Matthew D Johnson; Jared R Anderson; Ann Walker; Allison Wilcox; Virginia L Lewis; David C Robbins
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2013-09-09

8.  Life sustaining irritations? Relationship quality and mortality in the context of chronic illness.

Authors:  Kira Birditt; Toni C Antonucci
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Marital adjustment, satisfaction and dissolution among hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients and spouses: a prospective, five-year longitudinal investigation.

Authors:  Shelby L Langer; Jean C Yi; Barry E Storer; Karen L Syrjala
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Intimacy processes and psychological distress among couples coping with head and neck or lung cancers.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Hoda Badr
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.