Literature DB >> 10866083

MR cholangiopancreaticography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones.

M G Stiris1, B Tennøe, E Aadland, O C Lunde.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare MR cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP) vs. endoscopic retrograde pancreaticography (ERCP) in patients with suspected common bile duct (CBD) stone disease.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with suspected CBD disease underwent MRCP and then ERCP within 12 h of each other. The result of the MRCP was blinded to the reader of the ERCP. The MRCP was done using a superconducting 1.0 T unit with a heavily T2-weighted breath-hold technique. The ERCP was done in the fluoroscopy suite by one of the clinicians and was evaluated by one of the radiologists who had not read the MRCP examinations.
RESULTS: There were 28 true-positives, 17 true-negatives, 1 false-positive, and 4 false-negatives. The sensitivity was 87.5% and the specificity 94.4%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 96.6% and the negative predictive value was 81.1%.
CONCLUSION: MRCP was shown to be good enough to replace ERCP as a diagnostic method in patients with suspected CBD disease. MRCP is now our modality of choice after ultrasound in the diagnostic evaluation of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10866083     DOI: 10.1080/028418500127345226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  10 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Jing-Jia Mo; Li Lin; Chao-Qun Li; Jian-Feng Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 3.  Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Vanja Giljaca; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 4.  Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

5.  Is ERCP really necessary in case of suspected spontaneous passage of bile duct stones?

Authors:  Yuji Sakai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Takeshi Ishihara; Seigo Yukisawa; Tadashi Ohara; Masaru Tsuboi; Yoshihiko Ooka; Kazuki Kato; Kiyotake Katsuura; Michio Kimura; Makoto Takahashi; Kazuhisa Nemoto; Masaru Miyazaki; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Clinical models are inaccurate in predicting bile duct stones in situ for patients with gallbladder.

Authors:  B Topal; S Fieuws; K Tomczyk; R Aerts; W Van Steenbergen; C Verslype; F Penninckx
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Hospital cost categories of one-stage versus two-stage management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  B Topal; K Vromman; R Aerts; C Verslype; W Van Steenbergen; F Penninckx
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Mehmet Bilgin; Hüseyin Toprak; Mehmet Burgazli; S Sennur Bilgin; Ritvan Chasan; Ali Erdogan; Cem Balcı
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-03-12

9.  MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eva C Kaltenthaler; Stephen J Walters; Jim Chilcott; Anthony Blakeborough; Yolanda Bravo Vergel; Steven Thomas
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for secondary common bile duct stones compared with laparoscopic trans-cystic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Peixin Li; Zhongtao Zhang; Jianshe Li; Lan Jin; Wei Han; Jie Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-06-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.