Literature DB >> 10862677

Biodegradation kinetics of benzene, toluene, and phenol as single and mixed substrates for Pseudomonas putida F1.

K F Reardon1, D C Mosteller, J D Bull Rogers.   

Abstract

Although microbial growth on substrate mixtures is commonly encountered in bioremediation, wastewater treatment, and fermentation, mathematical modeling of mixed substrate kinetics has been limited. We report the kinetics of Pseudomonas putida F1 growing on benzene, toluene, phenol, and their mixtures, and compare mathematical models to describe these results. The three aromatics are each able to act as carbon and energy sources for this strain. Biodegradation rates were measured in batch cultivations following a protocol that eliminated mass transfer limitations for the volatile substrates and considered the culture history of the inoculum and the initial substrate to inoculum mass ratio. Toluene and benzene were better growth substrates than phenol, resulting in faster growth and higher yield coefficients. In the concentration ranges tested, toluene and benzene biodegradation kinetics were well described by the Monod model. The Monod model was also used to characterize phenol biodegradation by P. putida F1, although a small degree of substrate inhibition was noted. In mixture experiments, the rate of consumption of one substrate was found to be affected by the presence of the others, although the degree of influence varied widely. The substrates are catabolized by the same enzymatic pathway, but purely competitive enzyme kinetics did not capture the substrate interactions well. Toluene significantly inhibited the biodegradation rate of both of the other substrates, and benzene slowed the consumption of phenol (but not of toluene). Phenol had little effect on the biodegradation of either toluene or benzene. Of the models tested, a sum kinetics with interaction parameters (SKIP) model provided the best description of the paired substrate results. This model, with parameters determined from one- and two-substrate experiments, provided an excellent prediction of the biodegradation kinetics for the three-component mixture. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10862677     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0290(20000820)69:4<385::aid-bit5>3.0.co;2-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of aromatic hydrocarbon decomposition catalyzed by the dioxygenase system and substitution of ferredoxin and ferredoxin reductase.

Authors:  Jun Won Yang; Wooyoun Cho; Yejee Lim; Sungyoon Park; Dayoung Lee; Hyun-A Jang; Han S Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-23       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Bacterial growth and substrate degradation by BTX-oxidizing culture in response to salt stress.

Authors:  Chi-Yuan Lee; Ching-Hsing Lin
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Kinetics of growth and caffeine demethylase production of Pseudomonas sp. in bioreactor.

Authors:  Sathyanarayana N Gummadi; Devarai Santhosh
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Modelling the biphasic growth and product formation by Enterococcus faecium CECT 410 in realkalized fed-batch fermentations in whey.

Authors:  Nelson Pérez Guerra; Paula Fajardo; Clara Fuciños; Isabel Rodríguez Amado; Elisa Alonso; Ana Torrado; Lorenzo Pastrana
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-29

5.  Ammonia-Oligotrophic and Diazotrophic Heavy Metal-Resistant Serratia liquefaciens Strains from Pioneer Plants and Mine Tailings.

Authors:  Lily X Zelaya-Molina; Luis M Hernández-Soto; Jairo E Guerra-Camacho; Ricardo Monterrubio-López; Alfredo Patiño-Siciliano; Lourdes Villa-Tanaca; César Hernández-Rodríguez
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Biodegradation processes in a laboratory-scale groundwater contaminant plume assessed by fluorescence imaging and microbial analysis.

Authors:  Helen C Rees; Sascha E Oswald; Steven A Banwart; Roger W Pickup; David N Lerner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Phenol and cresol mixture degradation by the yeast Trichosporon cutaneum.

Authors:  Z Alexieva; M Gerginova; J Manasiev; P Zlateva; N Shivarova; A Krastanov
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  Exploring kinetics of phenol biodegradation by Cupriavidus taiwanesis 187.

Authors:  Yu-Hong Wei; Wei-Chuan Chen; Shan-Ming Chang; Bor-Yann Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Biodegradation kinetics and interactions of styrene and ethylbenzene as single and dual substrates for a mixed bacterial culture.

Authors:  Hossein Hazrati; Jalal Shayegan; Seyed Mojtaba Seyedi
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2015-10-19

10.  Biodegradation kinetics of aromatic hydrocarbon mixtures by pure and mixed bacterial cultures.

Authors:  Kenneth F Reardon; Douglas C Mosteller; Julia Bull Rogers; Nancy M DuTeau; Kee-Hong Kim
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.