Literature DB >> 10862217

Does the structure of clinical questions affect the outcome of curbside consultations with specialty colleagues?

G R Bergus1, C S Randall, S D Sinift, D M Rosenthal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical questions frequently arise during the practice of medicine, and primary care physicians frequently use curbside consultations with specialty physicians to answer these questions. It is hypothesized that well-formulated clinical questions are more likely to be answered and less likely to receive a recommendation for formal consultation.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between the structure of clinical questions asked by family physicians and the response of specialty physicians engaged in curbside consultations. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A case series of clinical questions asked during informal consultations between 60 primary care and 33 specialty physicians using an e-mail service. Curbside consultation questions were sent, using e-mail, to academic specialty physicians by primary care physicians (faculty, residents, and community practitioners) in eastern Iowa. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Questions were analyzed to determine the clinical task and to identify 3 components: an intervention, a comparison, and an outcome. Consultants' responses were analyzed to identify whether questions were answered and whether consultants recommended formal consultation.
RESULTS: There were 708 questions in this analysis: 278 (39.3%) were diagnosis questions, 334 (47.2%) were management questions, 57 (8.0%) were prognosis questions, and 39 (5.5%) were requests for direction. Clinical questions were less likely to go unanswered or receive a recommendation for formal consultation when the question identified the proposed intervention (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.86; P = .006) and desired outcome (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.69; P < .001). Only 271 (38.3%) of 708 curbside consult questions identified both of these components.
CONCLUSION: Medical specialists' responses to curbside consultation questions seem to be affected by the structure of these clinical questions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10862217     DOI: 10.1001/archfami.9.6.541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Fam Med        ISSN: 1063-3987


  23 in total

1.  The ECHO project: (50th) proposal for IQCPOP.

Authors:  John De Simone
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-03-16

2.  The need for needs assessment in continuing medical education.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Norman; Susan I Shannon; Michael L Marrin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-24

3.  Answering physicians' clinical questions: obstacles and potential solutions.

Authors:  John W Ely; Jerome A Osheroff; M Lee Chambliss; Mark H Ebell; Marcy E Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Towards evidence based medicine for paediatricians.

Authors:  Bob Phillips
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  The wisdom of Archimedes.

Authors:  B Phillips
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Towards evidence based medicine for paediatricians.

Authors:  Bob Phillips
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions.

Authors:  Xiaoli Huang; Jimmy Lin; Dina Demner-Fushman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

8.  Towards evidence-based medicine for paediatricians.

Authors:  Bob Phillips
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Question processing and clustering in INDOC: a biomedical question answering system.

Authors:  Parikshit Sondhi; Purushottam Raj; V Vinod Kumar; Ankush Mittal
Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol       Date:  2007

Review 10.  Towards evidence-based medicine for paediatricians.

Authors:  Bob Phillips
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.