Literature DB >> 10861413

On-line control of fed-batch fermentation of dilute-acid hydrolyzates.

M J Taherzadeh1, C Niklasson, G Lidén.   

Abstract

Dilute-acid hydrolyzates from lignocellulose are, to a varying degree, inhibitory to yeast. In the present work, dilute-acid hydrolyzates from spruce, birch, and forest residue, as well as synthetic model media, were fermented by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in fed-batch cultures. A control strategy based on on-line measurement of carbon dioxide evolution (CER) was used to control the substrate feed rate in a lab scale bioreactor. The control strategy was based solely on the ratio between the relative increase in CER and the relative increase in feed rate. Severely inhibiting hydrolyzates could be fermented without detoxification and the time required for fermentation of moderately inhibiting hydrolyzates was also reduced. The feed rate approached a limiting value for inhibiting media, with a corresponding pseudo steady-state value for CER. However, a slow decrease of CER with time was found for media containing high amounts of 5-hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF). The success of the control strategy is explained by the conversion of furfural and HMF by the yeast during fed-batch operation. The hydrolyzates contained between 1.4 and 5 g/l of furfural and between 2.4 and 6.5 g/l of HMF. A high conversion of furfural was obtained (between 65-95%) at the end of the feeding phase, but the conversion of HMF was considerably lower (between 12-40%). Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10861413     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0290(20000805)69:3<330::aid-bit11>3.0.co;2-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  7 in total

1.  Biological detoxification of different hemicellulosic hydrolysates using Issatchenkia occidentalis CCTCC M 206097 yeast.

Authors:  Bruno Guedes Fonseca; Rondinele de Oliveira Moutta; Flavio de Oliveira Ferraz; Emílio Rosa Vieira; Andrei Santini Nogueira; Bruno Fernandes Baratella; Luiz Carlos Rodrigues; Zhang Hou-Rui; Sílvio Silvério da Silva
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Cofactor dependence in furan reduction by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in fermentation of acid-hydrolyzed lignocellulose.

Authors:  Anneli Nilsson; Marie F Gorwa-Grauslund; Bärbel Hahn-Hägerdal; Gunnar Lidén
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Stress modulation as a means to improve yeasts for lignocellulose bioconversion.

Authors:  B A Brandt; T Jansen; H Volschenk; J F Görgens; W H Van Zyl; R Den Haan
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Comparison of ethanol yield from pretreated lignocellulo-starch biomass under fed-batch SHF or SSF modes.

Authors:  M G Mithra; M L Jeeva; M S Sajeev; G Padmaja
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-11-02

5.  Screening of Non- Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains for Tolerance to Formic Acid in Bioethanol Fermentation.

Authors:  Cyprian E Oshoma; Darren Greetham; Edward J Louis; Katherine A Smart; Trevor G Phister; Chris Powell; Chenyu Du
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Molecular adaptation mechanisms employed by ethanologenic bacteria in response to lignocellulose-derived inhibitory compounds.

Authors:  Omodele Ibraheem; Bongani K Ndimba
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 6.580

7.  Enhanced xylose fermentation and hydrolysate inhibitor tolerance of Scheffersomyces shehatae for efficient ethanol production from non-detoxified lignocellulosic hydrolysate.

Authors:  Srisuda Senatham; Thada Chamduang; Yotin Kaewchingduang; Anon Thammasittirong; Malee Srisodsuk; Adam Elliston; Ian N Roberts; Keith W Waldron; Sutticha Na-Ranong Thammasittirong
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.