Literature DB >> 10861273

Evaluation of prognosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus by endoscopic ultrasonography.

M Shinkai1, Y Niwa, T Arisawa, N Ohmiya, H Goto, T Hayakawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: For pretherapeutic staging of squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is considered the most profitable modality because it can provide cross sectional imaging of the tumour. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between prognosis and EUS findings, especially tumour area, in squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. PATIENTS/
METHODS: A total of 113 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus underwent EUS for pretherapeutic examination at Nagoya University Hospital. We compared EUS findings, histological results, and outcome. In addition, we measured the area of the tumour on EUS images (n=113) and evaluated if EUS area correlated with volume of the tumour on histological findings (n=50).
RESULTS: The overall accuracy rate of EUS was 83.2% (94/113) for depth of tumour invasion and 67.6% (69/102) for perioesophageal lymph node metastasis. The EUS area increased in proportion to the development of tumour infiltration, and patients with lymph node metastasis had a larger EUS area than patients without lymph node metastasis. There was a close correlation between EUS area and volume of the tumour on histological findings. If EUS area of the tumour was less than 50 mm(2), the five year survival rate was 100%. As EUS area increased, the survival rate decreased.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of EUS area of the tumour is reliable for quantification of the tumour and prediction of prognosis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10861273      PMCID: PMC1727960          DOI: 10.1136/gut.47.1.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  19 in total

1.  Endosonography and computed tomography of esophageal carcinoma. Preoperative classification compared to the new (1987) TNM system.

Authors:  T L Tio; P Cohen; P P Coene; J Udding; F C den Hartog Jager; G N Tytgat
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  T Rösch
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Results of a nationwide study on the three-field lymph node dissection of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  K Isono; H Sato; K Nakayama
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.935

4.  Successful screening for early esophageal cancer in alcoholics using endoscopy and mucosa iodine staining.

Authors:  A Yokoyama; T Ohmori; H Makuuchi; K Maruyama; K Okuyama; H Takahashi; T Yokoyama; K Yoshino; M Hayashida; H Ishii
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Endoscopic ultrasound in restaging of esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Authors:  G Isenberg; A Chak; M I Canto; N Levitan; J Clayman; B J Pollack; M V Sivak
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Superficial esophageal carcinoma: evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  H Yoshikane; Y Tsukamoto; Y Niwa; H Goto; S Hase; M Shimodaira; S Maruta; A Miyata; M Yoshida
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Endosonographic features predictive of lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  M F Catalano; M V Sivak; T Rice; L A Gragg; J Van Dam
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Endoscopic diagnosis of early carcinoma of the esophagus using Lugol's solution.

Authors:  K Sugimachi; K Kitamura; K Baba; M Ikebe; H Kuwano
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Preoperative staging of esophageal cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT.

Authors:  J F Botet; C J Lightdale; A G Zauber; H Gerdes; C Urmacher; M F Brennan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, quality of life, and prognosis after extended radical lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Comparison of three-field lymphadenectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  H Fujita; T Kakegawa; H Yamana; I Shima; Y Toh; Y Tomita; T Fujii; K Yamasaki; K Higaki; T Noake
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic ultrasonography: imaging and beyond.

Authors:  T Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Interim endoscopy results during neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer correlate with histopathological response and prognosis.

Authors:  Ulrike Heger; Franz Bader; Florian Lordick; Maria Burian; Rupert Langer; Martin Dobritz; Susanne Blank; Thomas Bruckner; Karen Becker; Ken Herrmann; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Katja Ott
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Prognostic significance of endoluminal ultrasound-defined disease length and tumor volume (EDTV) for patients with the diagnosis of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Christopher P Twine; S Ashley Roberts; Wyn G Lewis; B Vicki Dave; Claire E Rawlinson; David Chan; Mark Robinson; Tom D Crosby
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Superficial esophageal lesions detected by endoscopic ultrasound enhanced with submucosal edema.

Authors:  Jian-Jun Li; Long-Jun He; Hong-Bo Shan; Thomas D Wang; Huan Xiong; Li-Ming Chen; Guo-Liang Xu; Xiao-Hai Li; Xin-Xin Huang; Guang-Yu Luo; Yin Li; Rong Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Staging investigations for oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E P M van Vliet; M H Heijenbrok-Kal; M G M Hunink; E J Kuipers; P D Siersema
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Endoscopic Ultrasound for Preoperative Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lin-Na Luo; Long-Jun He; Xiao-Yan Gao; Xin-Xin Huang; Hong-Bo Shan; Guang-Yu Luo; Yin Li; Shi-Yong Lin; Guo-Bao Wang; Rong Zhang; Guo-Liang Xu; Jian-Jun Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  CircIMMP2L promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma malignant progression via CtBP1 nuclear retention dependent epigenetic modification.

Authors:  Yingkuan Liang; Qixing Mao; Lin Wang; Wenjie Xia; Bing Chen; Hui Wang; Rutao Li; Lin Xu; Feng Jiang; Gaochao Dong
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2021-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.