Literature DB >> 10860742

Changes in the 17 bp spacer in the P(R) promoter of bacteriophage lambda affect steps in open complex formation that precede DNA strand separation.

M McKane1, G N Gussin.   

Abstract

Tau plots and temperature-shift experiments were used to determine which step in the formation of transcriptionally-competent open complexes is affected by changing the length of the 17 bp spacer separating the -10 and -35 consensus regions of the P(R) promoter of bacteriophage lambda. Abortive initiation assays at 37 degrees C indicate that the primary effect of insertion of a base-pair, thereby increasing spacer length to 18 bp, is a decrease in k(f), the rate constant for conversion from closed (RP(c)) to open (RP(o)) complexes, by approximately a factor of 4. The mutation did not significantly affect K(B), the equilibrium constant for formation of closed complexes, and decreased K(B)k(f) by a factor of 3. Deletion of a bp to create a 16 bp spacer had a much greater effect, decreasing the measured value of k(f) by a factor of about 25 to 30, and K(B)k(f) by a factor of 7 to 8. When the values of the parameters for the deletion mutant were corrected for incomplete occupancy of RP(o) at equilibrium, the effects of the deletion were even greater. In particular, the corrected value of K(B)k(f) was about 15 times lower than the corresponding value for two promoters with wild-type spacing. Based on temperature shift experiments, the changes in spacer length did not affect the equilibrium at 20 degrees C between RP(i), a stable intermediate in which DNA strands are not separated, and RP(o). Although differential sensitivity of single-stranded bases to KMnO(4) indicated that in about 20% of the open complexes at 20 degrees C the DNA strands are not fully separated (RP(o1)), the distribution between these complexes and RP(o2) (DNA strands fully separated) was also not affected significantly by changes in spacer length. Thus, changes in spacer length primarily affect k(2), the rate constant for conversion of RP(c) to RP(i), which corresponds to a nucleation of DNA strand-separation. Application of published data and/or algorithms for determining effects of nucleotide sequence on twist angle or rise at individual bp steps does not provide a simple explanation of the difference in promoter strength between P(R) derivatives with 16 bp spacing and those with 18 bp spacing. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10860742     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  7 in total

1.  Transcriptional analysis of the tet(P) operon from Clostridium perfringens.

Authors:  P A Johanesen; D Lyras; T L Bannam; J I Rood
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  The Context-Dependent Influence of Promoter Sequence Motifs on Transcription Initiation Kinetics and Regulation.

Authors:  Drake Jensen; Eric A Galburt
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  New insights into the regulatory mechanisms of ppGpp and DksA on Escherichia coli RNA polymerase-promoter complex.

Authors:  Nicola Doniselli; Piere Rodriguez-Aliaga; Davide Amidani; Jorge A Bardales; Carlos Bustamante; Daniel G Guerra; Claudio Rivetti
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Sigma 32-dependent promoter activity in vivo: sequence determinants of the groE promoter.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Pieter L deHaseth
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Late steps in the formation of E. coli RNA polymerase-lambda P R promoter open complexes: characterization of conformational changes by rapid [perturbant] upshift experiments.

Authors:  Wayne S Kontur; Ruth M Saecker; Michael W Capp; M Thomas Record
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Solute probes of conformational changes in open complex (RPo) formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase at the lambdaPR promoter: evidence for unmasking of the active site in the isomerization step and for large-scale coupled folding in the subsequent conversion to RPo.

Authors:  Wayne S Kontur; Ruth M Saecker; Caroline A Davis; Michael W Capp; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  The core-independent promoter-specific interaction of primary sigma factor.

Authors:  Hsin-Yi Yeh; Tsung-Ching Chen; Kung-Ming Liou; Hsiu-Ting Hsu; Kuei-Min Chung; Li-Ling Hsu; Ban-Yang Chang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 16.971

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.