Literature DB >> 10860533

How do ants assess food volume?

.   

Abstract

By comparing the behaviour of Lasius niger scouts at sucrose droplets of different volumes, we empirically identified the criterion used by each scout to assess the amount of food available as well as the rules governing its decision to lay a recruitment trail. When scouts discovered food volumes exceeding the capacity of their crop (3 or 6 µl), 90% immediately returned to the nest laying a recruitment trail. In contrast, when smaller food droplets (0.3, 0.7 or 1 µl) were offered, several scouts stayed on the foraging area, presumably exploring it for additional food. If unsuccessful, they returned to the nest without laying a trail. The droplet volume determined the percentage of trail-laying ants but had no influence on the intensity of marking when this was initiated. The key criterion that regulated the recruiting behaviour of scouts was their ability to ingest their own desired volume. This volume acted as a threshold triggering the trail-laying response of foragers. Collective regulation of foraging according to food size resulted from the interplay between the distribution of these desired volume thresholds among colony members and the food volume available. We relate some aspects of the foraging ecology of aphid-tending ants to this decision-making process. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10860533     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  24 in total

1.  The emergence of collective foraging in the arboreal Gnamptogenys menadensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

Authors:  Christine A Johnson; Els Lommelen; Diane Allard; Bruno Gobin
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2003-06-26

2.  Regulation of ants' foraging to resource productivity.

Authors:  Anne-Catherine Mailleux; Jean-Louis Deneubourg; Claire Detrain
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Excavated substrate modulates growth instability during nest building in ants.

Authors:  Etienne Toffin; Jonathan Kindekens; Jean-Louis Deneubourg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Distributed leadership and adaptive decision-making in the ant Tetramorium caespitum.

Authors:  B Collignon; C Detrain
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Tandem carrying, a new foraging strategy in ants: description, function, and adaptive significance relative to other described foraging strategies.

Authors:  Benoit Guénard; Jules Silverman
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-06-10

6.  The multi-dimensional nature of information drives prioritization of private over social information in ants.

Authors:  Tomer J Czaczkes; John J Beckwith; Anna-Lena Horsch; Florian Hartig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Emergence of a complex movement pattern in an unfamiliar food place by foraging ants.

Authors:  Tomoko Sakiyama
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Spatiotemporal resource distribution and foraging strategies of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

Authors:  Michele Lanan
Journal:  Myrmecol News       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.514

9.  Noise improves collective decision-making by ants in dynamic environments.

Authors:  A Dussutour; M Beekman; S C Nicolis; B Meyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  The principles of collective animal behaviour.

Authors:  D J T Sumpter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.