Literature DB >> 10859413

Mismatch negativity and N100 in comatose patients.

C Fischer1, D Morlet, M Giard.   

Abstract

Mismatch negativity (MMN) and N100 auditory evoked potential were recorded in 52 healthy subjects and in 128 severely comatose patients. The MMN was present in 33/128 patients and N100 in 84/128. A ratio of 30/33 patients with MMN and 70/84 with N100 regained consciousness in a mean time of 6.3 +/- 4 days after the recording session. Thus, in terms of predicting return to consciousness, the MMN was more specific (90.9%) than the N100 (57.6%), but its sensitivity was lower (31.6% for MMN and 73.7% for N100, respectively). The amplitudes of MMN and N100 in comatose patients were smaller than those of healthy subjects. It is concluded that MMN and N100 can be very useful in predicting whether or not a comatose patient will regain consciousness. Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10859413     DOI: 10.1159/000013880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  12 in total

1.  A mismatch negativity study of local-global auditory processing.

Authors:  Alexandra List; Timothy Justus; Lynn C Robertson; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Coherence in resting-state EEG as a predictor for the recovery from unresponsive wakefulness syndrome.

Authors:  Barbara Schorr; Winfried Schlee; Marion Arndt; Andreas Bender
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Cross-diagnostic comparison of duration mismatch negativity and P3a in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

Authors:  Carol Jahshan; Jonathan K Wynn; Kristopher I Mathis; Lori L Altshuler; David C Glahn; Michael F Green
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 6.744

Review 4.  Improving the clinical assessment of consciousness with advances in electrophysiological and neuroimaging techniques.

Authors:  Jodie R Gawryluk; Ryan C N D'Arcy; John F Connolly; Donald F Weaver
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.474

5.  Preattentional and attentional cognitive deficits as targets for treating schizophrenia.

Authors:  David L Braff; Gregory A Light
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Animal models and measures of perceptual processing in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Steven J Siegel; John C Talpos; Mark A Geyer
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 7.  Deep temporal models and active inference.

Authors:  Karl J Friston; Richard Rosch; Thomas Parr; Cathy Price; Howard Bowman
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Attention to language: novel MEG paradigm for registering involuntary language processing in the brain.

Authors:  Yury Shtyrov; Marie L Smith; Aidan J Horner; Richard Henson; Pradeep J Nathan; Edward T Bullmore; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  "What" and "where" in auditory sensory processing: a high-density electrical mapping study of distinct neural processes underlying sound object recognition and sound localization.

Authors:  Victoria M Leavitt; Sophie Molholm; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; John J Foxe
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22

10.  Detection of event-related potentials in individual subjects using support vector machines.

Authors:  Hossein Parvar; Lauren Sculthorpe-Petley; Jason Satel; Rober Boshra; Ryan C N D'Arcy; Thomas P Trappenberg
Journal:  Brain Inform       Date:  2014-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.