Literature DB >> 10858356

In vitro activities of daptomycin, arbekacin, vancomycin, and gentamicin alone and/or in combination against glycopeptide intermediate-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an infection model.

R L Akins1, M J Rybak.   

Abstract

Daptomycin, a lipopeptide antibiotic, has broad activity against gram-positive organisms, similar to vancomycin; however, its mechanism of action differs, resulting in interference with cell membrane transport and a more rapid bactericidal activity. In light of increasing need for alternative treatments against intermediate-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, there is revitalized interest in this antibiotic. We, therefore, evaluated the activity of daptomycin alone or in combination in an in vitro infection model against two glycopeptide intermediate-resistant S. aureus (GISA) isolates. Newly designed regimens of daptomycin at 4 and 6 mg/kg of body weight every 24 h (q24h) were compared to the previous regimen of 3 mg/kg q12h. Daptomycin MICs and minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) (MIC/MBC) for Mu-50, HIP5836 (992), and MRSA-67 were 0.5/1.0, 0.5/1.0, and 0.125/0.5 microgram/ml, respectively. MICs and MBCs of arbekacin for the three strains were 2.0/8.0, 0. 125/0.5, and 0.125/0.25 microgram/ml, respectively. Vancomycin and gentamicin MICs and MBCs for the three strains were 8.0/8.0, 8.0/8.0, and 0.5/1.0 microgram/ml and 128/128, 0.5/1.0, and 0.25/0.5 microgram/ml, respectively. Our experience with daptomycin in an in vitro infection model has shown significant kill against the two GISA strains (Mu-50 and 992) (P < 0.03). We also noted that kill was related to a total dose effect for 992, in which simulated daptomycin in vivo dosages of 6 mg/kg q24h and 3 mg/kg q12h produced similar kill and 4 mg/kg q24h resulted in significant regrowth (P </= 0.05). Combination therapy with arbekacin resulted in synergistic activity against Mu-50. Daptomycin area under the concentration-time curve/MIC and C(max)/MIC ranges for GISA isolates were 80 to 116 and 6 to 12, respectively, and ranges for MRSA-67 were 320 to 461 and 24 to 48, respectively, and appeared to have an association with kill (i.e., decreased CFU/milliliter) at 24 and 48 h. Therefore, these experiments suggest that daptomycin alone or in combination could provide an alternative for the treatment of GISA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10858356      PMCID: PMC89987          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.44.7.1925-1929.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  20 in total

1.  Effect of protein binding of daptomycin on MIC and antibacterial activity.

Authors:  B L Lee; M Sachdeva; H F Chambers
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In-vitro model for simultaneous simulation of the serum kinetics of two drugs with different half-lives.

Authors:  J Blaser
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Comparative studies of the bactericidal, morphological and post-antibiotic effects of arbekacin and vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  T Watanabe; K Ohashi; K Matsui; T Kubota
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Effects of daptomycin and vancomycin on tobramycin nephrotoxicity in rats.

Authors:  D Beauchamp; M Pellerin; P Gourde; M Pettigrew; M G Bergeron
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Inhibition of cell wall turnover and autolysis by vancomycin in a highly vancomycin-resistant mutant of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  K Sieradzki; A Tomasz
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Influence of daptomycin on staphylococcal abscesses and experimental tobramycin nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  C A Wood; H C Finkbeiner; S J Kohlhepp; P W Kohnen; D N Gilbert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  In vitro pharmacodynamic effects of concentration, pH, and growth phase on serum bactericidal activities of daptomycin and vancomycin.

Authors:  K C Lamp; M J Rybak; E M Bailey; G W Kaatz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Pharmacokinetics and bactericidal rates of daptomycin and vancomycin in intravenous drug abusers being treated for gram-positive endocarditis and bacteremia.

Authors:  M J Rybak; E M Bailey; K C Lamp; G W Kaatz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Attenuation by daptomycin of gentamicin-induced experimental nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  N Thibault; L Grenier; M Simard; M G Bergeron; D Beauchamp
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Recommendations for preventing the spread of vancomycin resistance. Recommendations of the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC).

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  1995-09-22
View more
  26 in total

1.  Novel daptomycin combinations against daptomycin-nonsusceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro model of simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  Molly E Steed; Celine Vidaillac; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pharmacodynamics of cefepime alone and in combination with various antimicrobials against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic infection model.

Authors:  Vanthida Huang; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Bactericidal activities of two daptomycin regimens against clinical strains of glycopeptide intermediate-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  R L Akins; M J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Evaluation of standard- and high-dose daptomycin versus linezolid against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus isolates in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  Ashley D Hall; Molly E Steed; Cesar A Arias; Barbara E Murray; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Serum bactericidal activities of high-dose daptomycin with and without coadministration of gentamicin against isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus species.

Authors:  C Andrew DeRyke; Christina Sutherland; Bo Zhang; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Characterization of high-level daptomycin resistance in Viridans group Streptococci developed upon in vitro exposure to daptomycin.

Authors:  Ronda L Akins; Bradley D Katz; Catherine Monahan; Dylan Alexander
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  In vitro activities of quinupristin-dalfopristin and cefepime, alone and in combination with various antimicrobials, against multidrug-resistant staphylococci and enterococci in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  George P Allen; Raymond Cha; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Evaluation of the novel combination of high-dose daptomycin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole against daptomycin-nonsusceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  Molly E Steed; Brian J Werth; Cortney E Ireland; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Synergy of arbekacin-based combinations against vancomycin hetero-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Ji Young Lee; Won Sup Oh; Kwan Soo Ko; Sang Taek Heo; Chi Sook Moon; Hyun Kyun Ki; Sungmin Kiem; Kyong Ran Peck; Jae Hoon Song
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Activities of mutant prevention concentration-targeted moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  George P Allen; Glenn W Kaatz; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.