Literature DB >> 10856159

Safety of a two-day ultrarush insect venom immunotherapy protocol in comparison with protocols of longer duration and involving a larger number of injections.

R Brehler1, H Wolf, B Kütting, J Schnitker, T Luger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insect venom immunotherapy (VIT) is initiated by a dose increase protocol administered usually over 7 to 9 days. Shorter protocols have the advantage of reducing the patient's stay in the hospital. Very few data are currently available on the safety of shorter VIT dose increase protocols.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether a reduction in the duration of the VIT dose increase protocol from 7 to 9 days to 2 days causes an increase in the incidence and severity of adverse reactions.
METHODS: Between 1992 and 1997 we administered VIT to 1055 patients allergic to bee or wasp venom. We shortened the 7- to 9-day rush protocol stepwise to 2 days by reducing the number of injections and increasing the initial dose and compared the incidence and severity of adverse reactions. The patients were retrospectively divided into 3 cohorts: 20 injections over 7 to 9 days (cohort 1, 317 patients), 10 to 14 injections over 3 to 6 days (cohort 2, 335 patients), and 9 injections over 2 days (cohort 3, 403 patients).
RESULTS: We observed no severe adverse reactions in any of the cohorts during VIT. Adverse reactions were treated in 7.1% of the patients by oral and in 2.9% by intravenous antihistamines and in 0.8% by systemic corticosteroids. The incidence of adverse reactions declined significantly from 22.4% in cohort 1 to 13.7% in cohort 2 and 10.7% in cohort 3 with reduced number of injections (P <.001).
CONCLUSION: The incidence and severity of adverse reactions decline if the VIT dose increase protocol is shortened to 2 days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10856159     DOI: 10.1067/mai.2000.105708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Specific immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis. Current methods and innovative developments].

Authors:  O Pfaar; L Klimek
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Intolerance of specific immunotherapy with Hymenoptera venom: jumping the hurdle with omalizumab].

Authors:  D Wieczorek; A Kapp; B Wedi
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 3.  Clinical immunology review series: an approach to desensitization.

Authors:  M T Krishna; A P Huissoon
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Safety of specific immunotherapy using an ultra-rush induction regimen in bee and wasp allergy.

Authors:  Andrzej Bożek; Krzysztof Kołodziejczyk
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Induction of specific immunotherapy with hymenoptera venoms using ultrarush regimen in children: safety and tolerance.

Authors:  Alice Köhli-Wiesner; Lisbeth Stahlberger; Christian Bieli; Tamar Stricker; Roger Lauener
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-07-19

6.  Hymenoptera Venom Immunotherapy: Tolerance and Efficacy of an Ultrarush Protocol versus a Rush and a Slow Conventional Protocol.

Authors:  Vincenzo Patella; Giovanni Florio; Ada Giuliano; Carmine Oricchio; Giuseppe Spadaro; Gianni Marone; Arturo Genovese
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2012-05-24

Review 7.  Risk associated with bee venom therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeong Hwan Park; Bo Kyung Yim; Jun-Hwan Lee; Sanghun Lee; Tae-Hun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Twelve-hour ultrarush immunotherapy in a patient with mastocytosis and hymenoptera sting anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Doris Jäger; Jürgen Barth
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.084

Review 9.  [Venom immunotherapy. Side effects and efficacy of treatment].

Authors:  F Ruëff; B Przybilla
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.198

Review 10.  Stinging insect allergy: current perspectives on venom immunotherapy.

Authors:  Sian W Ludman; Robert J Boyle
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2015-07-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.