OBJECTIVES: This article presents a qualitative evaluation of the utility of Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) in geriatric care. GAS is an individualized outcome measure particularly suited for clients with multiple complex problems, such as are commonly served by geriatric programs. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were completed with 24 clinicians in four hospital or community-based geriatric services where GAS has been used. An inductive analysis was used to identify themes. RESULTS: GAS was described as resulting in shorter lengths of stay, more focused care, and improved team functioning. GAS was perceived as having greater use for functional (versus medical) goals, when clinicians had more direct control over treatments, when patients were involved in goal-setting, and when goals were set by an interdisciplinary team. DISCUSSION: GAS has affected both care practices and patient outcomes. This study illustrates the clinical impacts an outcome measure can have, as well as the use of qualitative methods for this type of research.
OBJECTIVES: This article presents a qualitative evaluation of the utility of Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) in geriatric care. GAS is an individualized outcome measure particularly suited for clients with multiple complex problems, such as are commonly served by geriatric programs. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were completed with 24 clinicians in four hospital or community-based geriatric services where GAS has been used. An inductive analysis was used to identify themes. RESULTS: GAS was described as resulting in shorter lengths of stay, more focused care, and improved team functioning. GAS was perceived as having greater use for functional (versus medical) goals, when clinicians had more direct control over treatments, when patients were involved in goal-setting, and when goals were set by an interdisciplinary team. DISCUSSION: GAS has affected both care practices and patient outcomes. This study illustrates the clinical impacts an outcome measure can have, as well as the use of qualitative methods for this type of research.
Authors: Susan Stark; Amanda Landsbaum; Janice L Palmer; Emily K Somerville; John C Morris Journal: Can J Occup Ther Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 1.614
Authors: Jerôme Jean Jacques van Dongen; Marloes Amantia van Bokhoven; Ramon Daniëls; Trudy van der Weijden; Wencke Wilhelmina Gerarda Petronella Emonts; Anna Beurskens Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 2.497