E L Teo1, P J Strouse, R J Hernandez. 1. Department of Radiology, C. S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan Health Centers, Ann Arbor 48109-0252, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether MR imaging features can reliably distinguish hemangiomas from malignant soft-tissue masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed MR imaging studies of 22 patients with soft-tissue hemangiomas and 22 patients with malignant soft-tissue masses. Images were reviewed and agreement reached by a consensus interpretation of two observers and by an independent observer. Masses were evaluated for signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images, for enhancement with gadolinium administration, and for morphology (lobulation, septation, central low-intensity dots). Lesion T2 signal and lesion enhancement with gadolinium administration were also objectively measured using regions of interest and comparison with skeletal muscle. RESULTS: Signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging of hemangiomas and malignant soft-tissue masses was similar. Subjective analysis showed greater T2 signal and gadolinium enhancement in hemangiomas; however, the differences were not statistically significant on objective analysis. Lobulation, septation, and central low-signal-intensity dots were all more common in hemangiomas, with statistical significance achieved; the combination of all three findings was specific for hemangioma. CONCLUSION: Although no single MR imaging feature was diagnostic in this study, analysis of lesion morphology, signal intensity, and enhancement with gadolinium allowed MR imaging differentiation of hemangiomas from malignant soft-tissue masses.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether MR imaging features can reliably distinguish hemangiomas from malignant soft-tissue masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed MR imaging studies of 22 patients with soft-tissue hemangiomas and 22 patients with malignant soft-tissue masses. Images were reviewed and agreement reached by a consensus interpretation of two observers and by an independent observer. Masses were evaluated for signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images, for enhancement with gadolinium administration, and for morphology (lobulation, septation, central low-intensity dots). Lesion T2 signal and lesion enhancement with gadolinium administration were also objectively measured using regions of interest and comparison with skeletal muscle. RESULTS: Signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging of hemangiomas and malignant soft-tissue masses was similar. Subjective analysis showed greater T2 signal and gadolinium enhancement in hemangiomas; however, the differences were not statistically significant on objective analysis. Lobulation, septation, and central low-signal-intensity dots were all more common in hemangiomas, with statistical significance achieved; the combination of all three findings was specific for hemangioma. CONCLUSION: Although no single MR imaging feature was diagnostic in this study, analysis of lesion morphology, signal intensity, and enhancement with gadolinium allowed MR imaging differentiation of hemangiomas from malignant soft-tissue masses.
Authors: Jan L M A Gielen; Arthur M De Schepper; Filip Vanhoenacker; Paul M Parizel; Xiaoling L Wang; Raf Sciot; Joost Weyler Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2004-07-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jose I Albergo; Czar Louie L Gaston; Mark Davies; Adesegun T Abudu; Simon R Carter; Lee M Jeys; Roger M Tillman; Robert J Grimer Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 3.075