BACKGROUND: Only few noninvasive methods have the potential to quantitate renal blood flow (RBF) in humans. Positron emission tomography (PET) is a clinical imaging method that can be used to measure the tissue blood flow noninvasively. The purpose of this study was to validate PET measurement of RBF using 15O-labeled water (H215O), a tracer that allows repeated measurements at short time intervals. METHODS: RBF was measured in six pigs by PET and by radioactive microspheres (MS). Three measurements were performed in each pig at baseline (BL), during vascular expansion and dopamine infusion (DA; 20 microg. kg-1. min-1 intravenously), and during angiotensin II (Ang II) infusion (50 ng. kg-1. min-1 intravenously). RBF was estimated from aortic and renal tracer kinetics using a model adapted from the blood flow model described by Kety and Smith. RESULTS: PET and MS values correlated strongly (y = 0.79x + 42, r = 0.93, P < 0.0001) over the RBF range from 100 to 500 mL. min-1. 100 g-1. Pharmacologically induced changes were significant and were measured equally well by PET and MS: 38 and 39%, respectively, below BL (P < 0.005 and P < 0.05) under Ang II, and 47 and 48%, respectively, above BL (P < 0.005 and P < 0.01) under DA. A Bland and Altman representation showed a low average difference of -17 +/- 45 mL. min-1. 100 g-1 (mean +/- SD). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this study provides the first validation of RBF measurement by PET using H215O over a large range of RBF values (100 to 500 mL. min-1. 100 g-1), which correspond to RBF values in both healthy subjects and in patients suffering from chronic renal failure.
BACKGROUND: Only few noninvasive methods have the potential to quantitate renal blood flow (RBF) in humans. Positron emission tomography (PET) is a clinical imaging method that can be used to measure the tissue blood flow noninvasively. The purpose of this study was to validate PET measurement of RBF using 15O-labeled water (H215O), a tracer that allows repeated measurements at short time intervals. METHODS: RBF was measured in six pigs by PET and by radioactive microspheres (MS). Three measurements were performed in each pig at baseline (BL), during vascular expansion and dopamine infusion (DA; 20 microg. kg-1. min-1 intravenously), and during angiotensin II (Ang II) infusion (50 ng. kg-1. min-1 intravenously). RBF was estimated from aortic and renal tracer kinetics using a model adapted from the blood flow model described by Kety and Smith. RESULTS: PET and MS values correlated strongly (y = 0.79x + 42, r = 0.93, P < 0.0001) over the RBF range from 100 to 500 mL. min-1. 100 g-1. Pharmacologically induced changes were significant and were measured equally well by PET and MS: 38 and 39%, respectively, below BL (P < 0.005 and P < 0.05) under Ang II, and 47 and 48%, respectively, above BL (P < 0.005 and P < 0.01) under DA. A Bland and Altman representation showed a low average difference of -17 +/- 45 mL. min-1. 100 g-1 (mean +/- SD). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this study provides the first validation of RBF measurement by PET using H215O over a large range of RBF values (100 to 500 mL. min-1. 100 g-1), which correspond to RBF values in both healthy subjects and in patients suffering from chronic renal failure.
Authors: Benjamin D Humphreys; Vincenzo Cantaluppi; Didier Portilla; Kai Singbartl; Li Yang; Mitchell H Rosner; John A Kellum; Claudio Ronco Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: N Kudomi; L Slimani; M J Järvisalo; J Kiss; R Lautamäki; G A Naum; T Savunen; J Knuuti; H Iida; P Nuutila; P Iozzo Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-05-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ashvinikumar V Mudaliar; Brent E Ellis; Patricia L Ricketts; Otto I Lanz; Elaine P Scott; Thomas E Diller Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Mark D Okusa; Bertrand L Jaber; Peter Doran; Jacques Duranteau; Li Yang; Patrick T Murray; Ravindra L Mehta; Can Ince Journal: Contrib Nephrol Date: 2013-05-13 Impact factor: 1.580
Authors: N Kudomi; M J Järvisalo; J Kiss; R Borra; A Viljanen; T Viljanen; T Savunen; J Knuuti; H Iida; P Nuutila; P Iozzo Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 9.236