Literature DB >> 10843101

Requirements for leaf position accuracy for dynamic multileaf collimation.

G J Budgell1, J H Mott, P C Williams, K J Brown.   

Abstract

Intensity modulated radiation therapy can be achieved by driving the leaves of a multileaf collimator (MLC) across an x-ray therapy beam. Algorithms to generate the required leaf trajectories assume that the leaf positions are exactly known to the MLC controller. In practice, leaf positions depend upon calibration accuracy and stability and may vary within set tolerances. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of potential leaf position inaccuracies on intensity modulated beams. Equations are derived which quantify the absolute error in delivered monitor units given a known error in leaf position. The equations have been verified by ionization chamber measurements in dynamically delivered flat fields, comparing deliveries in which known displacements have been applied to the defined leaf positions with deliveries without displacements applied. The equations are then applied to two clinical intensity modulations: an inverse planned prostate field and a breast compensating field. It is shown that leaf position accuracy is more critical for a highly modulated low-dose intensity profile than a moderately modulated high-dose intensity profile. Suggestions are given regarding the implications for quality control of dynamic MLC treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10843101     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/5/310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Is RapidArc more susceptible to delivery uncertainties than dynamic IMRT?

Authors:  Gregory T Betzel; Byong Yong Yi; Ying Niu; Cedric X Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.506

2.  Physical and dosimetric characteristic of high-definition multileaf collimator (HDMLC) for SRS and IMRT.

Authors:  Dayananda Shamurailatpam Sharma; Prabhakar M Dongre; Vaibav Mhatre; Malhotra Heigrujam
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.

Authors:  Karthikeyan Nithiyanantham; Ganesh K Mani; Vikraman Subramani; Lutz Mueller; Karrthick K Palaniappan; Tejinder Kataria
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  The dosimetric impact of control point spacing for sliding gap MLC fields.

Authors:  Benjamin J Zwan; Jonathan Hindmarsh; Erin Seymour; Kankean Kandasamy; Kirbie Sloan; Rajesakar David; Christopher Lee
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Impact of MLC properties and IMRT technique in meningioma and head-and-neck treatments.

Authors:  Steffi Kantz; Matthias Söhn; Almut Troeller; Michael Reiner; Helmut Weingandt; Markus Alber; Claus Belka; Ute Ganswindt
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  An EPID-based system for gantry-resolved MLC quality assurance for VMAT.

Authors:  Benjamin J Zwan; Michael P Barnes; Todsaporn Fuangord; Cameron J Stanton; Daryl J O'Connor; Paul J Keall; Peter B Greer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Impact of the MLC leaf-tip model in a commercial TPS: Dose calculation limitations and IROC-H phantom failures.

Authors:  Brandon Koger; Ryan Price; Da Wang; Dolla Toomeh; Sarah Geneser; Eric Ford
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Patient-specific quality assurance using machine log files analysis for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Authors:  Vivian U Y Chow; Monica W K Kan; Anthony T C Chan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.243

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.