Literature DB >> 10840432

Long-term hazard of progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: continued risk of biochemical failure after 5 years.

C L Amling1, M L Blute, E J Bergstralh, T M Seay, J Slezak, H Zincke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cure from malignancy is commonly defined as a disease-free state lasting 5 years after treatment. We analyzed clinical and biochemical progression rates after radical prostatectomy for men with clinically localized prostate cancer with particular attention to recurrence beyond 5 years. Annual hazard rates of progression were calculated to determine the probability of recurrence at specific intervals following surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 2,782 men with clinically localized prostate cancer (cT1-T2) undergoing radical prostatectomy between 1987 and 1993 were reviewed. All patients were treated in the prostate specific antigen (PSA) era so that serial followup PSA values were available from the time of surgery. Analysis was limited to patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment within 90 days of radical prostatectomy. Disease progression was defined as documented local recurrence, systemic progression and/or PSA 0.4 ng./ml. or greater. Lymph node positive cases were eliminated from analysis since almost all received adjuvant hormonal therapy. Annual hazard rates for progression were calculated using the formula: [No. events / No. patients at risk] x 100. Progression-free survival probabilities were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: Pathological stage was pT2a-b, N0 (68%), pT3a, N0 (21%) and pT3b, N0 (11%). Biochemical progression-free survival at 5 and 10 years was 76% and 59%, respectively, for the entire study population while those with pathologically organ confined (pT2, N0) cancers had progression-free survival rates of 82% and 68% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. A total of 819 patients (29%) eventually had disease progression, including 160 (6%) with progression after 5 years. Annual hazard rates were highest during the first 2 years after radical prostatectomy for the entire population. Patients with adverse prognostic features (pT3b, PSA 10 ng./ml. or greater, Gleason score 8-10 and nondiploid cancers) had high initial hazard rates that decreased with time to lower levels. Those with pathologically organ confined cancer had low but constant hazard rates throughout followup.
CONCLUSIONS: Although progression after radical prostatectomy usually occurs early, reflecting the impact of clinical under staging, a significant number of men, including those with organ confined cancers, will continue to have disease progression after 5 years. Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy should be subjected to long-term followup to allow the option of early intervention should progression occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10840432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  90 in total

1.  Influence of PSA, PSA velocity and PSA doubling time on contrast-enhanced 18F-choline PET/CT detection rate in patients with rising PSA after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Orazio Schillaci; Ferdinando Calabria; Mario Tavolozza; Cristiana Ragano Caracciolo; Enrico Finazzi Agrò; Roberto Miano; Antonio Orlacchio; Roberta Danieli; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  PSA doubling time for prediction of [(11)C]choline PET/CT findings in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Maria Picchio; Vincenzo Scattoni; Rita Garcia Parra; Alberto Briganti; Luigi Gianolli; Francesco Montorsi; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Factors determining biochemical recurrence in low-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sıtkı Ün; Hakan Türk; Osman Koca; Rauf Taner Divrik; Ferruh Zorlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-06

4.  Radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: Effect of timing of postprostatectomy radiation on functional outcomes.

Authors:  Heather L Huelster; Aaron A Laviana; Daniel D Joyce; Li-Ching Huang; Zhiguo Zhao; Tatsuki Koyama; Karen E Hoffman; Ralph Conwill; Michael Goodman; Ann S Hamilton; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Lisa E Paddock; Antoinette Stroup; Matthew Cooperberg; Mia Hashibe; Brock B O'Neil; Sherrie H Kaplan; Sheldon Greenfield; David F Penson; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  Postoperative statin use and risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.

Authors:  Emma H Allott; Lauren E Howard; Matthew R Cooperberg; Christopher J Kane; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Prostate cancer that is within 0.1 mm of the surgical margin of a radical prostatectomy predicts greater likelihood of recurrence.

Authors:  Jason P Izard; Lawrence D True; Philip May; William J Ellis; Paul H Lange; Bruce Dalkin; Daniel W Lin; Rodney A Schmidt; Jonathan L Wright
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 7.  Management Options for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Farhad Fakhrejahani; Ravi A Madan; William L Dahut
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-05

8.  Mer Tyrosine Kinase Regulates Disseminated Prostate Cancer Cellular Dormancy.

Authors:  Frank C Cackowski; Matthew R Eber; James Rhee; Ann M Decker; Kenji Yumoto; Janice E Berry; Eunsohl Lee; Yusuke Shiozawa; Younghun Jung; Julio A Aguirre-Ghiso; Russell S Taichman
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 4.429

9.  Disseminated tumor cells in prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy and without evidence of disease predicts biochemical recurrence.

Authors:  Todd M Morgan; Paul H Lange; Michael P Porter; Daniel W Lin; William J Ellis; Ian S Gallaher; Robert L Vessella
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Development and validation of a 32-gene prognostic index for prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Chin-Lee Wu; Brock E Schroeder; Xiao-Jun Ma; Christopher J Cutie; Shulin Wu; Ranelle Salunga; Yi Zhang; Michael W Kattan; Catherine A Schnabel; Mark G Erlander; W Scott McDougal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.