OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to improve health care workers' compliance with hand hygiene after patient contact by use of an alcohol-based hand antiseptic. DESIGN AND METHODS: Six commercially available alcohol-based hand antiseptics were evaluated. The one most pleasing to the evaluators' hands was selected for the study. Baseline handwashing rates were assessed on 2 medical wards. Alcohol dispensers were mounted by every door on the 2 wards. An educational campaign was conducted with 4 weekly visits to these floors to remind and reinstruct staff about the use of the alcohol dispensers and to address questions. After 2 months handwashing rates were reassessed. SETTING: The study was set in a university hospital. RESULTS: The baseline handwashing rate was 60% (76/126). Physicians were most compliant (83%), followed by nurses (60%), technologists (56%), and housekeepers (36%). Two months later overall hand hygiene rates had decreased to 52% (P = .26). Nurses were most compliant (67%), followed by technologists (57%), physicians (29%), and housekeepers (25%). Physician compliance was associated with compliance by attending physicians whose example was usually followed by all other physicians on rounds. CONCLUSIONS: A brief educational campaign and installation of dispensers containing a rapidly acting hand hygiene product near hospital rooms did not affect hand hygiene compliance. The behavior of attending physicians was predictive of handwashing rates for all others in the attending's retinue. Compliance with handwashing after half of all patient contacts was a result of perfect compliance by some and total noncompliance by others being observed.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to improve health care workers' compliance with hand hygiene after patient contact by use of an alcohol-based hand antiseptic. DESIGN AND METHODS: Six commercially available alcohol-based hand antiseptics were evaluated. The one most pleasing to the evaluators' hands was selected for the study. Baseline handwashing rates were assessed on 2 medical wards. Alcohol dispensers were mounted by every door on the 2 wards. An educational campaign was conducted with 4 weekly visits to these floors to remind and reinstruct staff about the use of the alcohol dispensers and to address questions. After 2 months handwashing rates were reassessed. SETTING: The study was set in a university hospital. RESULTS: The baseline handwashing rate was 60% (76/126). Physicians were most compliant (83%), followed by nurses (60%), technologists (56%), and housekeepers (36%). Two months later overall hand hygiene rates had decreased to 52% (P = .26). Nurses were most compliant (67%), followed by technologists (57%), physicians (29%), and housekeepers (25%). Physician compliance was associated with compliance by attending physicians whose example was usually followed by all other physicians on rounds. CONCLUSIONS: A brief educational campaign and installation of dispensers containing a rapidly acting hand hygiene product near hospital rooms did not affect hand hygiene compliance. The behavior of attending physicians was predictive of handwashing rates for all others in the attending's retinue. Compliance with handwashing after half of all patient contacts was a result of perfect compliance by some and total noncompliance by others being observed.
Authors: Elise Grover; Mohammed Kamal Hossain; Saker Uddin; Mohini Venkatesh; Pavani K Ram; Robert Dreibelbis Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Jackson S Musuuza; Anna Barker; Caitlyn Ngam; Lia Vellardita; Nasia Safdar Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Mary G Lankford; Teresa R Zembower; William E Trick; Donna M Hacek; Gary A Noskin; Lance R Peterson Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Daniel Kimani; Rachel Kamau; Renuka Gadde; Dejana Selenic; Stephen Maina; Lawrence Marum; Gao Hongjiang; Samuel Mwalili; Anthony Marfin; Jane Mwangi Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Gaby Judah; Robert Aunger; Wolf-Peter Schmidt; Susan Michie; Stewart Granger; Val Curtis Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Janet E Squires; Kathryn N Suh; Stefanie Linklater; Natalie Bruce; Kathleen Gartke; Ian D Graham; Alan Karovitch; Joanne Read; Virginia Roth; Karen Stockton; Emma Tibbo; Kent Woodhall; Jim Worthington; Jeremy M Grimshaw Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 7.327