Literature DB >> 10839422

Breast augmentation: choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane.

D A Hidalgo1.   

Abstract

A retrospective study of 220 patients was performed to review surgical design in breast augmentation. Three specific issues were studied: incision site, implant variables, and pocket plane selection. The influence of these three factors on aesthetic results in both primary and secondary cases was the focus of the analysis. No attempt was made to address long-term issues such as capsular contracture or saline implant deflation rates. In 77 primary augmentation patients and 80 unilateral augmentations for symmetry in breast reconstruction, there were the following untoward results: 11 revisions for unilateral malposition, change to a different implant shape, or change to a larger implant size; four deflations of saline implants requiring replacement; and four conversions of saline to silicone gel implants. In 63 secondary cases, there were two hematomas and two infections requiring implant removal and subsequent replacement. Operative technique in breast augmentation is described, as are recommendations for each of the options associated with the three variables studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10839422     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200005000-00047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  11 in total

1.  [Plastic surgical body form correction. Part II: Face-lift, periorbital surgery, and breast augmentation and reduction].

Authors:  H Ryssel; G Germann; C Heitmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Minimal inframammary incision for breast augmentation.

Authors:  Nabil Fanous; Caroline Tawilé; Valérie J Brousseau
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2008

3.  The Application of Anatomy Combined With Ultrasound Knife in Transaxillary Endoscopic Biplane Breast Augmentation.

Authors:  Jiachao Xiong; Qiang Hou; Zheyuan Hu; Yakun Gao; Lu Lu; Meiqing Sun; Hao Hu; Yuxin Qian; Hui Wang; Hua Jiang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-27

4.  The use of the Alexis(®) device in breast augmentation to improve outcomes: a comparative randomized case-control survey.

Authors:  Luca Andrea Dessy; Nefer Fallico; Francesco Serratore; Diego Ribuffo; Marco Mazzocchi
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-06

5.  Prevention of implant malposition in inframammary augmentation mammaplasty.

Authors:  Yoon Ji Kim; Yang Woo Kim; Young Woo Cheon
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-07-15

6.  Delphi Consensus Recommendations: Intraoperative Technique and Postoperative Management of Patients with Natrelle 410 Implants.

Authors:  G Patrick Maxwell; Mitchell H Brown; Per Hedén; Jie Luan; Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Mollie Carter
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-12-09

7.  Ten-Year Safety Data for Eurosilicone's Round and Anatomical Silicone Gel Breast Implants.

Authors:  Franck Duteille; Pierre Perrot; Marie-Hélène Bacheley; Erin Bell; Sharon Stewart
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2019-04-27

8.  Observations Concerning the Match between Breast Implant Dimensions, Breast Morphometry, and a Patient-reported Outcome.

Authors:  Tim Brown
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-01-25

9.  Five-year Safety Data for Eurosilicone's Round and Anatomical Silicone Gel Breast Implants.

Authors:  Franck Duteille; Michel Rouif; Sophie Laurent; Máirín Cannon
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-05-07

10.  Breast augmentation in male-to-female transgender patients: Technical considerations and outcomes.

Authors:  Travis J Miller; Stelios C Wilson; Jonathan P Massie; Shane D Morrison; Thomas Satterwhite
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2019-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.