Literature DB >> 10837943

Four prognostic groups predict long-term survival from prostate cancer following radiotherapy alone on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group clinical trials.

M Roach1, J Lu, M V Pilepich, S O Asbell, M Mohiuddin, R Terry, D Grignon, M Mohuidden.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Gleason score (GS), T stage, and pathologic lymph node status have been described as major independent predictors of death due to prostate cancer in men treated with external beam radiotherapy (XRT). In this analysis we combine these three factors to define prognostic subgroups that correlate with disease-specific survival (DSS) death from prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Men entered on one of four Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Phase III randomized trials between 1975 and 1992, for clinically localized prostate cancer (CAP) (n = 1557), were selected for this analysis. Patients were included if: 1) they were evaluable, and eligible for the trial; 2) they received no hormonal therapy with their initial treatment; and 3) follow-up was available. For this study a DSS event was declared if: 1) death was certified as due to CAP; 2) death was due to complications of treatment; or 3) death was from unknown causes with active malignancy. The median follow-up for patients treated on early and late RTOG studies exceeded 11 and 6 years respectively. Subgroups were identified based on their pretreatment GS, T-stage, and lymph node such that patients with similar risk of dying from prostate cancer were combined.
RESULTS: By combining patients with similar DSS, four subgroups were identified. Risk Group 1 patients had a GS = 2-6, and T1-2Nx; Group 2: GS = 2-6, T3Nx; or GS = 2-6, N+, or GS = 7, T1-2Nx; Group 3: T3Nx, GS = 7; or N+, GS = 7, or T1-2Nx, GS = 8-10; and Group 4 patients were T3Nx, GS = 8-10, or N+, GS = 8-10. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year DSS was 96%, 86%, and 72%; 94%, 75%, and 61%; 83%, 62%, and 39%; and 64%, 34%, and 27% for Groups 1 through 4, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Recognition of these four risk groups provides a basis for estimating the long-term DSS for men treated with XRT alone and should facilitate the design of future prospective randomized trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10837943     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00578-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  41 in total

Review 1.  Multidisciplinary intervention of early, lethal metastatic prostate cancer: Report from the 2015 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy Meeting.

Authors:  Andrea K Miyahira; Joshua M Lang; Robert B Den; Isla P Garraway; Tamara L Lotan; Ashley E Ross; Tanya Stoyanova; Steve Y Cho; Jonathan W Simons; Kenneth J Pienta; Howard R Soule
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 2.  [Treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  M P Wirth; O W Hakenberg; M Fröhner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  [Radical salvage prostatectomy : Treatment of local recurrence of prostate cancer after radiotherapy].

Authors:  A Heidenreich; R Semrau; D Thüer; D Pfister
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  The changing landscape of treatment options for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer: challenges and solutions for physicians and patients.

Authors:  Carole Alison Chrvala
Journal:  P T       Date:  2012-08

Review 5.  Imaging and evaluation of patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Luis S Beltran; Roy A Raad; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  High-risk prostate cancer-classification and therapy.

Authors:  Albert J Chang; Karen A Autio; Mack Roach; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 7.  Contemporary management of high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark Garzotto; Arthur Y Hung
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  70 Gy or more: which dose for which prostate cancer?

Authors:  U Ganswindt; F Paulsen; A G Anastasiadis; A Stenzl; M Bamberg; C Belka
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 9.  Management of locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Heather Payne
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  The importance of local control in high-risk locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Sridharan; P Warde
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.