Literature DB >> 10834575

The impact of gentle contacts on ease of handling, welfare, and growth of calves and on quality of veal meat.

B J Lensink1, X Fernandez, X Boivin, P Pradel, P Le Neindre, I Veissier.   

Abstract

It has been demonstrated previously that regularly stroking and letting calves suck fingers leads to less avoidance and more approach behavior of the calves toward people. To examine whether these positive contacts affect the welfare and productivity of calves and the quality of veal meat we used 22 veal calves housed in individual crates. Half of them received minimal contact with the stockperson (controls), and the other half were given additional gentle contacts around meals, by stroking the calves and allowing them to suck the stockperson's fingers, during the entire fattening period (21 wk). Welfare was assessed through behavioral reactivity (reactions to handling, to surprise stimuli, and to novelty), neuroendocrine responses to stress (cortisol in response to an ACTH challenge, catecholamine-synthesizing enzymes), and health (number of medical treatments, abomasal lesions). Calf productivity was assessed through growth rates and meat quality through glycolytic potential (an estimator of resting glycogen level in muscle), pH, and color. Calves that received gentle contacts were less agitated (P < .01) and tended to defecate less (P = .08) when handled in a cart on wheels than the control calves, but no treatment effects were found in reactivity to novelty and surprise stimuli, responses to ACTH, and catecholamine synthetic potential. Calves given gentle contacts had fewer abomasal lesions than controls (0/11 vs 4/11, P = .05). The glycolytic potential of the semimembranosus muscle was higher in calves that received gentle contacts than in controls (172.6 vs 154.1 micromol/g, P < .05), but no treatment effects were observed on meat pH, meat color, or growth rates. It is concluded that gentling veal calves reduces their reactions to handling. Gentle contacts reduce the reaction to transport shown by differences in glycolytic potential. In addition, the reduction in reactions to handling and the decreased incidence of abomasal lesions can contribute to an improvement of the calves' welfare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10834575     DOI: 10.2527/2000.7851219x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  13 in total

1.  Long-term effects of good handling practices during the pre-weaning period of crossbred dairy heifer calves.

Authors:  Luciana Pontes Silva; Aline Cristina Sant'Anna; Lívia Carolina Magalhães Silva; Mateus José Rodrigues Paranhos da Costa
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Influences on the assessment of resource- and animal-based welfare indicators in unweaned dairy calves for usage by farmers.

Authors:  Jason J Hayer; Dorit Nysar; Céline Heinemann; Caroline D Leubner; Julia Steinhoff-Wagner
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

3.  Welfare of cattle during transport.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Paolo Pasquali; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Bernadette Earley; Sandra Edwards; Luigi Faucitano; Sonia Marti; Genaro C Miranda de La Lama; Leonardo Nanni Costa; Peter T Thomsen; Sean Ashe; Lina Mur; Yves Van der Stede; Mette Herskin
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-09-07

4.  Matricaria chamomilla CH12 decreases handling stress in Nelore calves.

Authors:  Luis Souza Lima de Souza Reis; Paulo Eduardo Pardo; Eunice Oba; Sergio do Nascimento Kronka; Neuza Maria Frazatti-Gallina
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.672

5.  Effects of human visitation on calf growth and performance of calves fed different milk replacer feeding levels.

Authors:  N E Guindon; N T Antaya; R G Cabral; N L Whitehouse; T J Earleywine; P S Erickson
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) on a request from the Commission related with the risks of poor welfare in intensive calf farming systems.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2006-06-06

7.  Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2009-07-09

8.  Effect of Finishing Diet and Lairage Time on Steers Welfare in Uruguay.

Authors:  Marcia Del Campo Gigena; Juan Manuel Soares de Lima; Gustavo Brito; Xavier Manteca; Pilar Hernández; Fabio Montossi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  The Welfare of Cattle, Sheep, Goats and Pigs from the Perspective of Traumatic Injuries Detected at Slaughterhouse Postmortem Inspection.

Authors:  Lenka Valkova; Vladimir Vecerek; Eva Voslarova; Michal Kaluza; Daniela Takacova
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 10.  How Can We Assess Positive Welfare in Ruminants?

Authors:  Silvana Mattiello; Monica Battini; Giuseppe De Rosa; Fabio Napolitano; Cathy Dwyer
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.