Literature DB >> 10831341

The efficacy of transvaginal sonographic screening in asymptomatic women at risk for ovarian cancer.

J R van Nagell1, P D DePriest, M B Reedy, H H Gallion, F R Ueland, E J Pavlik, R J Kryscio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of annual transvaginal sonography (TVS) as a screening method for ovarian cancer.
METHODS: Annual TVS screening was performed on 14, 469 asymptomatic women from 1987 to 1999. Eligibility criteria included (1) all women >/= 50 years of age and (2) women >/= 25 years of age with a family history of ovarian cancer. Ovarian volume was calculated using the prolate ellipsoid (length x height x width x 0.523). An abnormal sonogram was defined by (1) an ovarian volume >10 cm(3) in postmenopausal women or >20 cm(3) in premenopausal women or (2) a papillary or complex tissue projection into a cystic ovarian tumor. All women with abnormal TVS had a repeat sonogram in 4-6 weeks. Patients with a persistently abnormal second screen had a serum CA-125 determination, tumor morphology indexing, and Doppler flow sonography, and were advised to have surgical tumor removal.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty patients with persisting TVS abnormalities underwent exploratory laparoscopy or laparotomy. Seventeen ovarian cancers were detected: 11 Stage I, 3 Stage II, and 3 Stage III. Only three patients with Stage I cancers had a palpable ovarian mass on clinical examination. All patients with Stage I and II ovarian cancer are alive without recurrence 1.8-9.8 years (median, 4.5 years) after diagnosis. Two of the three Stage III patients have died of disease: one at 4.3 years and one at 7.7 years after detection. Four patients developed ovarian cancer within 12 months of a negative scan (FN): 2 Stage II, 2 Stage III. Three of these patients are alive with no evidence of disease 0.4, 1.9, and 5.5 years after diagnosis, and 1 patient has died of disease 0.7 years after diagnosis. Four patients developed ovarian cancer more than 12 months following a normal screen. All 4 presented clinically with Stage III disease. Two of these patients have died of disease and two patients are alive 1.5 and 2.1 years after diagnosis. TVS screening was associated with the following statistical variables: sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 98.9%; positive predictive value (PPV), 9.4%; and negative predictive value (NPV), 99.97%. After 46, 113 screening years, there have been 3 ovarian cancer deaths in the annually screened population and 2 ovarian cancer deaths in women receiving less than annual screening. The survival of ovarian cancer patients in the annually screened population was 95.0 +/- 4.9% at 2 years and 88.2 +/- 8.0% at 5 years. Excluding all cases of nonepithelial or borderline epithelial malignancies, the survival of patients with ovarian cancer in the annually screened population was 92.9 +/- 6.9% at 2 years and 83.6 +/- 10.8% at 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: (1) TVS screening, when performed annually, is associated with a decrease in stage at detection and a decrease in case-specific ovarian cancer mortality. (2) TVS screening does not appear to be effective in detecting ovarian cancer in which ovarian volume is normal. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10831341     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  50 in total

1.  Screening for ovarian cancer: recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 2.  Ovarian cancer screening.

Authors:  Usha Menon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Complementary Longitudinal Serum Biomarkers to CA125 for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Archana R Simmons; Evangelia Ourania Fourkala; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Andy Ryan; Margie N Sutton; Keith Baggerly; Hui Zheng; Karen H Lu; Ian Jacobs; Steven Skates; Usha Menon; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-04-09

4.  Ovarian cancer risk in relation to medical visits, pelvic examinations and type of health care provider.

Authors:  Haim A Abenhaim; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Daniel W Cramer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  The approach to ovarian dermoids in adolescents and young women.

Authors:  Kathleen E O'Neill; Amber R Cooper
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.814

Review 6.  Contemporary progress in ovarian cancer screening.

Authors:  Christine S Walsh; B Y Karlan
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Treatment guidelines in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  A Poveda Velasco; A Casado Herráez; A Cervantes Ruipérez; D Gallardo Rincón; E García García; A González Martín; G López García; C Mendiola Fernández; B Ojeda González
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 8.  Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the premenopausal ovarian mass.

Authors:  Leeber Cohen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Early detection of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Partha M Das; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.851

10.  Integration of cell phone imaging with microchip ELISA to detect ovarian cancer HE4 biomarker in urine at the point-of-care.

Authors:  Shuqi Wang; Xiaohu Zhao; Imran Khimji; Ragip Akbas; Weiliang Qiu; Dale Edwards; Daniel W Cramer; Bin Ye; Utkan Demirci
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 6.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.