Literature DB >> 10831214

The repeatability of discrete and continuous anterior segment grading scales.

E Chong1, T Simpson, D Fonn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the repeatability of three anterior segment clinical grading scales: 1) verbal descriptors scale (VDS), 2) photographic matching scale (PS), and 3) continuous matching scale (CS).
METHODS: Five optometrists graded 30 slides each of 3-9-o'clock staining, bulbar redness, and palpebral conjunctival roughness twice, separated by at least a day. VDS and PS were five-point scales (0-4) with half grades permitted. The CS was a 5-second, 240-frame video movie generated using morphing software. PS and CS grading was done with references presented on a computer screen.
RESULTS: Averaged across observers, the test-retest intraclass correlation, correlation coefficient of concordance, and Pearson's r ranged from 0.95 to 0.99 (all p < 0.001). Coefficients of repeatability using CS to grade all three ocular conditions ranged between 0.31 and 0.49. The corresponding PS and VDS coefficients of repeatability ranged between 0.37 and 0.49; PS generally had better repeatability than VDS.
CONCLUSIONS: Each of the clinical grading scales was reliable. The coefficients of repeatability showed that bulbar redness and palpebral conjunctival roughness were graded with higher precision using CS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10831214     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200005000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  7 in total

1.  [Documentation of ophthalmological findings in contact lens wearers: software-based symbol library of the Efron grading scale].

Authors:  C Jürgens; B Rudolph; R Grossjohann; F Tost
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  A new scale for the assessment of conjunctival bulbar redness.

Authors:  Ilaria Macchi; Vatinee Y Bunya; Mina Massaro-Giordano; Richard A Stone; Maureen G Maguire; Yuanjie Zheng; Min Chen; James Gee; Eli Smith; Ebenezer Daniel
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Incremental nature of anterior eye grading scales determined by objective image analysis.

Authors:  J S Wolffsohn
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Objective Assessment of Ocular Surface Response to Contact Lens Wear in Presbyopic Contact Lens Wearers of Asian Descent.

Authors:  Michel Guillon; Kathy Dumbleton; Panagiotis Theodoratos; Trisha Patel; Tom Karkkainen; Kurt Moody
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.018

5.  Comparison of different smartphone cameras to evaluate conjunctival hyperaemia in normal subjects.

Authors:  Carles Otero; Nery García-Porta; Juan Tabernero; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Awareness of treatment: A source of bias in subjective grading of ocular complications.

Authors:  Genis Cardona; Noelia Esterich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  A Review of Imaging Biomarkers of the Ocular Surface.

Authors:  William W Binotti; Betul Bayraktutar; M Cuneyt Ozmen; Stephanie M Cox; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.152

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.