Literature DB >> 10831104

Latency of the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components: stimulus dependence and insights toward perception.

T P Roberts1, P Ferrari, S M Stufflebeam, D Poeppel.   

Abstract

This review will focus on investigations of the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field component, the M100, detectable in the magnetoencephalogram recorded during presentation of auditory stimuli, approximately 100 milliseconds after stimulus onset. In particular, the dependence of M100 latency on attributes of the stimulus, such as intensity, pitch and timbre will be discussed, along with evidence relating M100 latency observations to perceptual features of the stimuli. Comparison with investigation of the analogous electrical potential component, the N1, will be made. Parametric development of stimuli from pure tones through complex tones to speech elements will be made, allowing the influence of spectral pitch, virtual pitch and perceptual categorization to be delineated and suggesting implications for the role of such latency observations in the study of speech processing. The final section will deal with potential clinical applications offered by M100 latency measurements, as objective indices of normal and abnormal cortical processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10831104     DOI: 10.1097/00004691-200003000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  57 in total

1.  You had me at "Hello": Rapid extraction of dialect information from spoken words.

Authors:  Mathias Scharinger; Philip J Monahan; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Theta and Gamma Bands Encode Acoustic Dynamics over Wide-Ranging Timescales.

Authors:  Xiangbin Teng; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  A new approach to neuroimaging with magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Arjan Hillebrand; Krish D Singh; Ian E Holliday; Paul L Furlong; Gareth R Barnes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Speech-induced suppression of evoked auditory fields in children who stutter.

Authors:  Deryk S Beal; Maher A Quraan; Douglas O Cheyne; Margot J Taylor; Vincent L Gracco; Luc F De Nil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Denoising based on time-shift PCA.

Authors:  Alain de Cheveigné; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Processing asymmetry of transitions between order and disorder in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Maria Chait; David Poeppel; Alain de Cheveigné; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Intracranial recording and source localization of auditory brain responses elicited at the 50 ms latency in three children aged from 3 to 16 years.

Authors:  Oleg Korzyukov; Eishi Asano; Valentina Gumenyuk; Csaba Juhász; Michael Wagner; Robert D Rothermel; Harry T Chugani
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Auditory temporal edge detection in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Maria Chait; David Poeppel; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Dynamics of self-monitoring and error detection in speech production: evidence from mental imagery and MEG.

Authors:  Xing Tian; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  "Change deafness" arising from inter-feature masking within a single auditory object.

Authors:  Nicolas Barascud; Timothy D Griffiths; David McAlpine; Maria Chait
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.