Literature DB >> 1082937

The accuracy of recording patient problems in family practice.

B G Bentsen.   

Abstract

In 1974 several studies were conducted on the validity of medical data recorded and computerized at family medical centers affiliated with the University of Western Ontario. Fifty-nine encounters were observed. An average of 2.54 somatic, emotional, or social problems were dealt with per encounter. The residents recorded an average of 1.51 problems and the observers 2.45. This difference is highly statistically significant (p less than .001). There was no significant statistical differences among the observers. The many questions this study raises may have a bearing on medical education, medical audit, research, medical computer systems, and perhaps even on quality of care since problem-solving is based on problem identification. Further studies and evaluation are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1082937     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-197604000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Educ        ISSN: 0022-2577


  15 in total

1.  Problem-solving & decision-making in family practice.

Authors:  I R McWhinney
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Development of explicit criteria to measure adherence to hypertension guidelines.

Authors:  J L Milchak; B L Carter; G Ardery; H R Black; G L Bakris; D W Jones; C D Kreiter
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Residents evaluate their training in family practice.

Authors:  G T Swart; P McAvoy
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Accuracy of data in computer-based patient records.

Authors:  W R Hogan; M M Wagner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Meaningful use's benefits and burdens for US family physicians.

Authors:  G Talley Holman; Steven E Waldren; John W Beasley; Deborah J Cohen; Lawrence D Dardick; Chester H Fox; Jenna Marquard; Ryan Mullins; Charles Q North; Matt Rafalski; A Joy Rivera; Tosha B Wetterneck
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  The doctor/patient relationship and its effect upon outcome.

Authors:  M A Stewart; I R McWhinney; C W Buck
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1979-02

7.  Screening for psychosocial problems among primary care patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  I McDowell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1987-12-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  The problem of diagnostic variability in general practice.

Authors:  D L Crombie; K W Cross; D M Fleming
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Concordance of the ambulatory medical record and patients' recollections of aspects of an ambulatory new-patient visit.

Authors:  J W Ramsdell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  A comparison of self-report and chart audit in studying resident physician assessment of cardiac risk factors.

Authors:  D A Leaf; W E Neighbor; D Schaad; C S Scott
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.