Literature DB >> 10826770

Tissues formed during distraction osteogenesis in the rabbit are determined by the distraction rate: localization of the cells that express the mRNAs and the distribution of types I and II collagens.

G Li1, A S Virdi, D E Ashhurst, A H Simpson, J T Triffitt.   

Abstract

An experimental model of leg lengthening was used to study the morphology of, the collagenous proteins present, and the collagen genes expressed in the regenerating tissue following 20% lengthening at four different distraction rates. At a distraction rate of 0.3 mm/day (8 weeks distraction), the regenerate consists of intramembranous bone and localized areas of fibrocartilage. At rates of 0.7 (4 weeks) and 1.3 mm/day (2 weeks), the bone that grows from the cut ends of the cortical bone is separated by fibrous tissue and cartilage is present. At 2.7 mm/day (1 week), only fibrous tissue and sparse bone are present. Type I collagen is present in the matrices around the cells expressing its mRNA and similarly, type II collagen is located around the chondrocytes. Type I collagen mRNA is expressed predominantly by the fibroblasts in the fibrous tissue, the bone surface cells and to a reduced extent by the osteocytes. Type II collagen mRNA is expressed by chondrocytes. The results suggest that osteoblasts and chondrocytes within the regenerate originate from the same pool of progenitor cells, and the differentiation of these cells and the expression of types I and II collagen genes are altered by different rates of distraction. These observations suggest that the optimal rate of distraction in the model is 0.7 mm/day.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10826770     DOI: 10.1006/cbir.1999.0449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biol Int        ISSN: 1065-6995            Impact factor:   3.612


  7 in total

1.  [Evaluation of potential damage to the regenerate during callus molding after mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Experimental study using an animal model].

Authors:  C Kunz; N Adolphs; P Buescher; B Hammer; B Rahn
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-05

Review 2.  Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Lisa R Amir; Vincent Everts; Antonius L J J Bronckers
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 3.  Bone lengthening (distraction osteogenesis): a literature review.

Authors:  F Sailhan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Immunolocalization of sibling and RUNX2 proteins during vertical distraction osteogenesis in the human mandible.

Authors:  Lisa R Amir; Andreas Jovanovic; Frits B T Perdijk; Satoru Toyosawa; Vincent Everts; Antonius L J J Bronckers
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  Distraction osteogenesis in dog with a tooth-borne device: Histological and histomorphometric analysis.

Authors:  Francisco Vale; Inês Francisco; João Cavaleiro; Francisco Caramelo; Adriana Guimarães; João Brochado
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-01-01

6.  Simulating lateral distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Frank Niemeyer; Lutz Claes; Anita Ignatius; Nicholaus Meyers; Ulrich Simon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Differential Effect of Cobalt and Chromium Ions as Well as CoCr Particles on the Expression of Osteogenic Markers and Osteoblast Function.

Authors:  Andreas Drynda; Susanne Drynda; Jörn Kekow; Christoph Hubertus Lohmann; Jessica Bertrand
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.